H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Eduardo Masso vs Dan Goldie H2H: 0-1

Dan Goldie holds a 1–0 lead over Eduardo Masso in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dan Goldie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dan Goldie won the 1991 Seoul round of 32 2-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eduardo Masso
BEL Age 62 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Dan Goldie
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dan Goldie #92 2-6 6-1 6-3 Eduardo Masso #99 Match data Apr 18, 1991* R32 Seoul ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eduardo Masso #1,177 #56 568 1,685 41 69 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Dan Goldie #738 #27 457 1,855 122 117 51.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eduardo Masso Dan Goldie
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1984 7–4 63.6% #101 1,615 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1985 3–9 25.0% #265 1,603 0 0
22 1986 0–4 0.0% #208 1,457 0 0 1986 8–10 44.4% #113 1,658 0 0
23 1987 1–2 33.3% #185 1,472 0 0 1987 24–19 55.8% #50 1,765 0 1
24 1988 13–14 48.1% #87 1,602 0 0 1988 36–19 65.5% #29 1,800 0 2
25 1989 4–10 28.6% #305 1,566 0 0 1989 12–14 46.2% #67 1,735 0 2
26 1990 5–6 45.5% #125 1,593 0 0 1990 24–26 48.0% #96 1,658 0 2
27 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,619 0 0 1991 8–15 34.8% #181 1,574 0 2
28 1992 3–14 17.6% #219 1,519 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eduardo Masso Dan Goldie
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1986 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 9 11 20 45.0% — — — — 10 5 15 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
24 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1988 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
25 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% 1989 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
26 1990 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 18 17 35 51.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
27 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1992 — — — — 0 10 10 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 11 17 28 39.3% 18 32 50 36.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 16 25 36.0% — 79 69 148 53.4% 4 12 16 25.0% 19 16 35 54.3% 20 20 40 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 44/51 of Eduardo Masso's and 21/23 of Dan Goldie's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Eduardo Masso Dan Goldie
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
27 1991 28/34 0.6 2.6 67.3% 58.1% 47.4% 48.3% 47.5% 54.2% 40.4% 1991 21/23 3.2 7.7 52.3% 69.1% 45.8% 58.5% 42.0% 57.8% 35.2%
28 1992 16/17 1.1 1.5 76.6% 56.9% 44.8% 47.8% 41.6% 54.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44/110 0.8 2.2 70.7% 57.7% 46.5% 48.1% 45.4% 54.1% 40.0% — 21/239 3.2 7.7 52.3% 69.1% 45.8% 58.5% 42.0% 57.8% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eduardo Masso Dan Goldie
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1494 104.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.14
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1616 132.0 — — — — -12 -15 — 59.3% +0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 -0.33
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1603 117.3 — — — — +16 -57 — 34.5% -0.90 0–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.69
22 1986 1458 101.2 — — — — — +37 — 11.1% -2.67 0–1 0–1 — +0.24 1986 1658 131.7 — — — — +38 -102 — 43.1% -0.35 5–3 (63%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -0.61
23 1987 1472 114.7 — — — — +65 — — 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 — -0.13 1987 1765 144.5 — — — — -2 — -38 52.1% +0.15 11–6 (65%) 10–6 (63%) 110.6 -2.01
24 1988 1603 127.2 — — — — -10 -71 -28 44.1% -0.81 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 105.0 -0.57 1988 1801 136.5 — — — — +24 — -130 57.8% +0.35 17–6 (74%) 10–6 (63%) 108.7 -0.07
25 1989 1567 106.0 — — — — -3 -69 — 31.4% -1.89 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 103.3 +0.01 1989 1735 130.2 — — — — -17 -245 +91 47.8% -0.38 3–4 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 100.2 -0.95
26 1990 1594 127.8 — — — — -26 -11 — 48.0% -0.32 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -0.54 1990 1658 132.5 — — — — +19 — +189 50.4% +0.05 8–11 (42%) 8–10 (44%) 95.1 +1.16
27 1991 1619 127.8 -3.84 +1.27 0.882 47.4% -71 +55 — 41.3% -0.61 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 98.1 -0.97 1991 1575 122.7 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +54 — +181 35.6% -0.95 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 99.4 -1.05
28 1992 1519 114.2 -3.66 -0.40 0.858 46.8% +31 +9 — 27.3% -1.34 1–3 (25%) 1–8 (11%) 93.9 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1685 127.2 -3.77 +0.66 0.873 47.2% -19 +7 -28 37.7% -1.01 18–17 (51%) 16–23 (41%) 101.4 -1.73 — 1856 140.1 -2.17 -1.09 0.835 46.9% +18 -98 +41 49.7% -0.08 53–37 (59%) 52–45 (54%) 107.4 -1.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.