H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Eduardo Masso vs Tomas Smid H2H: 1-0
Eduardo Masso holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eduardo Masso leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Eduardo Masso won the 1988 Brussels third round 6-7 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 62
Left-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 70
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 24, 1988* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Eduardo Masso | 6-7 6-3 7-6 | Tomas Smid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Masso | #1,177 | #56 | 568 | 1,684 | 41 | 69 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tomas Smid | #975 | #11 | 28 | 1,998 | 497 | 318 | 61.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eduardo Masso | Tomas Smid | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #154 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #67 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #36 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #185 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #27 | 1,870 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #87 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #23 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #305 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 54–28 | 65.9% | #28 | 1,864 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1990 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #125 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 62–28 | 68.9% | #24 | 1,901 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 59–30 | 66.3% | #17 | 1,902 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1992 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #219 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 46–27 | 63.0% | #16 | 1,840 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #19 | 1,804 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #31 | 1,729 | 0 | 10 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #115 | 1,656 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #453 | 1,537 | 0 | 10 |