H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Eduardo Schwank vs Daniel Brands H2H: 1-0

Eduardo Schwank holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eduardo Schwank leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eduardo Schwank won the 2008 Austrian Open Kitzbühel second round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eduardo Schwank
ARG Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eduardo Schwank #58 6-1 6-4 Daniel Brands #251 Match data Jul 18, 2008* R16 Austrian Open Kitzbühel International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eduardo Schwank #1,858 #48 1,380 1,741 37 61 37.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eduardo Schwank Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 — — — — — — — 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2007 0–1 0.0% #175 1,529 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2008 15–15 50.0% #58 1,704 0 0 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2009 3–14 17.6% #118 1,573 0 0 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2010 12–21 36.4% #74 1,593 0 0 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,587 0 0 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2012 4–4 50.0% #216 1,672 0 0 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eduardo Schwank Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
21 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7%
23 2009 1 4 5 20.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2010 2 8 10 20.0% 10 11 21 47.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
25 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0%
26 2012 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 20 28 28.6% 28 34 62 45.2% 1 7 8 12.5% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Eduardo Schwank Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2007 1/1 2.0 4.0 64.8% 42.9% 47.4% 44.4% 100.0% 44.4% 32.6% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2008 30/30 4.5 2.5 63.6% 70.4% 51.7% 68.0% 43.3% 63.6% 36.2% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2009 17/17 3.1 3.9 57.7% 61.2% 46.1% 45.4% 33.9% 54.3% 33.6% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2010 33/33 3.7 3.5 61.7% 68.2% 49.9% 45.0% 36.8% 61.3% 34.9% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2011 9/9 3.0 2.8 63.4% 67.0% 58.0% 50.9% 45.9% 63.8% 32.5% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2012 8/8 4.3 2.3 67.5% 68.0% 56.5% 52.6% 46.9% 64.2% 37.9% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
Career — 98/98 3.8 3.1 62.3% 67.3% 51.0% 53.3% 40.6% 61.1% 35.1% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eduardo Schwank Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2007 1530 102.1 -1.83 -1.86 0.586 39.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.14 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2008 1705 135.0 +0.30 -0.16 0.996 50.1% -118 +77 -155 47.4% +0.13 6–5 (55%) 5–10 (33%) — -0.42 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2009 1574 112.7 -5.72 -2.82 0.735 44.5% -9 +102 -73 23.3% -1.95 2–4 (33%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.84 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2010 1594 132.3 -1.26 -1.90 0.901 47.8% -53 +122 — 39.7% -1.00 1–5 (17%) 9–3 (75%) — +0.43 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2011 1588 117.4 +0.98 -2.80 0.898 48.4% -54 +100 — 35.0% -0.60 0–2 3–4 (43%) — -0.03 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2012 1673 119.1 +0.19 +1.41 1.060 50.5% — +49 — 50.0% +0.05 1–1 3–2 (60%) — -0.39 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2013 1625 92.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2014 1591 99.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
Career — 1741 127.6 -1.24 -1.34 0.901 48.1% -68 +95 -114 39.5% -0.69 10–17 (37%) 25–21 (54%) 101.4 +0.58 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.