H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Eduardo Schwank vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 0-1
Thiemo de Bakker holds a 1–0 lead over Eduardo Schwank in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiemo de Bakker leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2010 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2010* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Thiemo de Bakker | 6-3 7-5 | Eduardo Schwank | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eduardo Schwank | #1,858 | #48 | 1,380 | 1,742 | 37 | 61 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eduardo Schwank | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2009 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #118 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2011 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #143 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2012 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #216 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |