H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Egor Gerasimov vs Jiri Vesely H2H: 1-1
Egor Gerasimov and Jiri Vesely are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Egor Gerasimov won the 2020 Nur-Sultan fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Belarus
Age 33
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Czechia
Age 33
Left-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2020* | Nur-Sultan | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Egor Gerasimov | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2020* | Pune | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Jiri Vesely | 7-6(2) 5-7 6-3 | Egor Gerasimov | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2019 | Dubai | ATP 500 | Q2 | Hard | Egor Gerasimov | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Jiri Vesely | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Egor Gerasimov | #780 | #65 | 950 | 1,817 | 44 | 52 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jiri Vesely | #1,213 | #35 | 1,125 | 1,924 | 129 | 160 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Egor Gerasimov | Jiri Vesely | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #85 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #66 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #41 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #62 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #89 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2018 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #157 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #105 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2019 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #98 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #68 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2020 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #78 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #83 | 1,629 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2021 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #113 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2022 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #278 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #292 | 1,709 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2023 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #366 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,670 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |