H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Elias Ymer vs Bjorn Fratangelo H2H: 0-1
Bjorn Fratangelo holds a 1–0 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bjorn Fratangelo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bjorn Fratangelo won the 2019 Indian Wells Masters first round 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 2021 | Washington | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Elias Ymer | 6-4 6-3 | Bjorn Fratangelo | Match data |
| Jul 26, 2021 | Atlanta | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Bjorn Fratangelo | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
| Mar 9, 2019* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Bjorn Fratangelo | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bjorn Fratangelo | #1,096 | #99 | 583 | 1,738 | 22 | 40 | 35.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elias Ymer | Bjorn Fratangelo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #128 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #114 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #110 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #136 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #698 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |