H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Elias Ymer vs Joao Sousa H2H: 1-3
Joao Sousa holds a 3–1 lead over Elias Ymer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Joao Sousa leads 2–0 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Elias Ymer won the 2022 Doha third round 2-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
POR
Age 37
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2022* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Elias Ymer | 2-6 6-3 7-5 | Joao Sousa | Match data |
| Feb 5, 2022* | Pune | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Joao Sousa | 5-7 7-6(4) 7-5 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
| Jul 19, 2019* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Joao Sousa | 4-6 6-4 6-2 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
| Jul 11, 2014* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Joao Sousa | 6-3 7-5 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Joao Sousa | #954 | #28 | 1,355 | 1,917 | 189 | 247 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elias Ymer | Joao Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #592 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #49 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–33 | 41.1% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #33 | 1,904 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 24–32 | 42.9% | #43 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #57 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #44 | 1,783 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #60 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #90 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #140 | 1,545 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #249 | 1,509 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #726 | 1,503 | 0 | 4 |