H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Elias Ymer vs Thiemo de Bakker H2H: 1-1
Elias Ymer and Thiemo de Bakker are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Thiemo de Bakker won the 2016 Barcelona second round 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Sweden
Age 30
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2016* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Thiemo de Bakker | 6-4 6-7(3) 6-3 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
| Apr 22, 2015* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | R64 | Clay | Elias Ymer | 6-7(4) 7-5 6-4 | Thiemo de Bakker | Match data |
| Feb 9, 2015 | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | Q2 | Clay | Thiemo de Bakker | 6-3 6-3 | Elias Ymer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elias Ymer | #183 | #105 | 534 | 1,696 | 29 | 68 | 29.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiemo de Bakker | #1,382 | #40 | 1,010 | 1,853 | 54 | 80 | 40.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elias Ymer | Thiemo de Bakker | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #769 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #464 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #228 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #444 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2015 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #249 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2016 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #160 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2017 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #142 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #115 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #223 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2019 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #176 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #146 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2021 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #170 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #144 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2022 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #127 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2023 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #155 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #257 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2024 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #327 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2025 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2026 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |