H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Emil Ruusuvuori vs Benoit Paire H2H: 2-1
Emil Ruusuvuori holds a 2–1 lead over Benoit Paire in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emil Ruusuvuori leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Benoit Paire leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Benoit Paire won the 2022 Geneva third round 7-5 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Finland
Age 27
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
France
Age 37
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2022* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Benoit Paire | 7-5 5-7 6-4 | Emil Ruusuvuori | Match data |
| Aug 26, 2021* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Emil Ruusuvuori | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Benoit Paire | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2021* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Emil Ruusuvuori | 4-6 6-4 3-0 (ret.) | Benoit Paire | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emil Ruusuvuori | #545 | #37 | 1,041 | 1,886 | 97 | 98 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Benoit Paire | #862 | #18 | 1,805 | 1,951 | 239 | 293 | 44.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emil Ruusuvuori | Benoit Paire | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #86 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #152 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2021 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2022 | 32–28 | 53.3% | #40 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #47 | 1,781 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2023 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 32–30 | 51.6% | #26 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #95 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #118 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #549 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #19 | 1,922 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–31 | 41.5% | #47 | 1,715 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 31–31 | 50.0% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #28 | 1,708 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 13–28 | 31.7% | #46 | 1,658 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 4–22 | 15.4% | #179 | 1,594 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #415 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |