H2H data updated: 2026-07-15 14:15 UTC
Emilio Nava vs Andy Murray H2H: 0-1
Andy Murray holds a 1–0 lead over Emilio Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Andy Murray leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Andy Murray won the 2022 US Open second round 5-7 6-3 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 39
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Andy Murray | 5-7 6-3 6-1 6-0 | Emilio Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andy Murray | #160 | #1 | 12,685 | 2,470 | 703 | 264 | 72.7% | 3 | 14 | 1 | 10 | 16 | 44 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Nava | Andy Murray | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #64 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #17 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 40–14 | 74.1% | #11 | 1,959 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #4 | 2,194 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 64–12 | 84.2% | #4 | 2,211 | 0 | 14 |
| 23 | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,134 | 0 | 16 |
| 24 | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 21 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 53–17 | 75.7% | #3 | 2,254 | 1 | 23 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 41–8 | 83.7% | #4 | 2,263 | 2 | 27 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,227 | 2 | 30 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 63–15 | 80.8% | #2 | 2,288 | 2 | 34 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 71–8 | 89.9% | #1 | 2,464 | 3 | 42 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 26–10 | 72.2% | #16 | 2,223 | 3 | 43 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #240 | 2,083 | 3 | 43 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #125 | 2,014 | 3 | 44 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,953 | 3 | 44 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #134 | 1,897 | 3 | 44 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #49 | 1,865 | 3 | 44 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #42 | 1,780 | 3 | 44 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #160 | 1,707 | 3 | 44 |