H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emilio Nava vs Mikhail Kukushkin
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Emilio Nava vs Mikhail Kukushkin.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
Kazakhstan
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mikhail Kukushkin | #316 | #39 | 1,075 | 1,907 | 144 | 218 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Nava | Mikhail Kukushkin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #148 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #132 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #59 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #91 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #107 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #67 | 1,783 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,803 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 16–23 | 41.0% | #65 | 1,752 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #89 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #53 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #67 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #89 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #182 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #188 | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #298 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |