H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Emilio Nava vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 0-1
Roberto Bautista Agut holds a 1–0 lead over Emilio Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2024 Miami Masters first round 6-3 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2024* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Roberto Bautista Agut | 6-3 7-6(4) | Emilio Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Nava | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 |