H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Emilio Nava vs Steve Johnson H2H: 0-1
Steve Johnson holds a 1–0 lead over Emilio Nava in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Johnson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Johnson won the 2022 Winston-Salem second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
United States
Age 24
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2024* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Emilio Nava | 6-7(6) 7-6(10) 6-4 | Steve Johnson | Match data |
| Aug 23, 2022* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Steve Johnson | 6-3 6-2 | Emilio Nava | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Nava | #91 | #74 | 753 | 1,715 | 14 | 33 | 29.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steve Johnson | #1,015 | #21 | 1,680 | 1,981 | 196 | 201 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Nava | Steve Johnson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #944 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #323 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #178 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #636 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #147 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #212 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #175 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #88 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #91 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #32 | 1,957 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #33 | 1,880 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #33 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #85 | 1,704 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,697 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #241 | 1,575 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1017 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 |