H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Aaron Krickstein H2H: 3-0
Emilio Sanchez holds a 3–0 lead over Aaron Krickstein in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1994 Hamburg Masters second round 1-6 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1994* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 1-6 7-5 6-4 | Aaron Krickstein | Match data |
| Jul 12, 1991* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 6-3 6-2 | Aaron Krickstein | Match data |
| May 17, 1986* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 6-3 6-3 | Aaron Krickstein | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Aaron Krickstein | #1,299 | #6 | 1,544 | 2,043 | 381 | 252 | 60.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Aaron Krickstein | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #93 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 34–17 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,865 | 0 | 4 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,765 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #26 | 1,840 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #61 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 47–23 | 67.1% | #15 | 1,879 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #8 | 2,006 | 0 | 7 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #20 | 1,816 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #34 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #28 | 1,825 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #45 | 1,786 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1994 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #35 | 1,723 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1995 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #70 | 1,591 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1092 | 1,534 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |