H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Bohdan Ulihrach H2H: 0-3
Bohdan Ulihrach holds a 3–0 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Bohdan Ulihrach leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Bohdan Ulihrach won the 1996 Prague semifinal 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1996* | Prague | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-3 6-1 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1995* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(6) | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1995* | Bastad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Bohdan Ulihrach | 6-3 6-1 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Bohdan Ulihrach | #805 | #22 | 1,399 | 1,841 | 218 | 236 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Bohdan Ulihrach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #28 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #34 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1998 | 31–28 | 52.5% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #107 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #76 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 2001 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #32 | 1,772 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #246 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #86 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 2005 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #285 | 1,559 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #349 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | 2007 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |