H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC

Emilio Sanchez vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-1

Emilio Sanchez holds a 3–1 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1996 Monte Carlo Masters second round 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 24, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Fabrice Santoro #117 7-6(2) 6-3 Emilio Sanchez #128 Match data
Nov 12, 1993* Buenos Aires ATP 250 R16 Clay Emilio Sanchez #41 5-7 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #58 Match data
Sep 2, 1990* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Emilio Sanchez #7 6-3 6-4 5-7 3-6 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #104 Match data
May 10, 1990* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Emilio Sanchez #8 4-6 6-1 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,038 402 272 59.6% 0 1 0 0 14 15
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilio Sanchez Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,545 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,668 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,841 0 3 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 1988 39–19 67.2% #17 1,907 0 8 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,871 0 9 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,812 0 11 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,823 0 14 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1992 40–25 61.5% #21 1,783 0 15 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,686 0 15 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,628 0 15 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,587 0 15 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6