H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Emilio Sanchez vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 3-1

Emilio Sanchez holds a 3–1 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 2–1 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabrice Santoro won the 1996 Monte-Carlo Masters round of 64 7-6(2) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fabrice Santoro #117 7-6(2) 6-3 Emilio Sanchez #128 Match data Apr 24, 1996* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Emilio Sanchez #41 5-7 6-3 6-2 Fabrice Santoro #58 Match data Nov 12, 1993* R16 Argentina Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Emilio Sanchez #7 6-3 6-4 5-7 3-6 7-5 Fabrice Santoro #104 Match data Sep 2, 1990* R32 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Emilio Sanchez #8 4-6 6-1 6-1 Fabrice Santoro #98 Match data May 10, 1990* R32 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,037 406 274 59.7% 0 1 0 1 13 15
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,890 462 435 51.5% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilio Sanchez Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,546 0 0 1992 28–23 54.9% #43 1,748 0 0
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,669 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,631 0 0
21 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,840 0 3 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,736 0 0
22 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,610 0 0
23 1988 40–20 66.7% #17 1,887 0 8 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,558 0 0
24 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,877 0 9 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,803 0 1
25 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,814 0 11 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,708 0 1
26 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,849 0 14 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 1992 43–26 62.3% #21 1,795 0 15 2000 34–27 55.7% #31 1,739 0 3
28 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,688 0 15 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,630 0 15 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,740 0 4
30 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,588 0 15 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15 2004 18–15 54.5% #52 1,815 0 4
32 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,781 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,701 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,788 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,757 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,696 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,689 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilio Sanchez Fabrice Santoro
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 8 4 12 66.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
19 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 21 13 34 61.8% — — — — 1 4 5 20.0%
20 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 15 11 26 57.7% — — — — — — — — 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 8 11 19 42.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 43 12 55 78.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1994 12 9 21 57.1% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 8 9 17 47.1% 41 9 50 82.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 3 7 10 30.0% 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
23 1988 14 7 21 66.7% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 16 6 22 72.7% 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 9 6 15 60.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1%
25 1990 15 4 19 78.9% 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5% 1998 14 15 29 48.3% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0%
26 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
27 1992 19 7 26 73.1% 22 13 35 62.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2000 22 16 38 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 23 16 39 59.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 20 15 35 57.1% 7 6 13 53.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 13 18 31 41.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 22 14 36 61.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
30 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 11 11 22 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
31 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 13 11 24 54.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1997 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 10 9 19 52.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 9 13 22 40.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 3 6 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 15 12 27 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 11 10 21 52.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 74 178 58.4% 280 159 439 63.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 18 33 51 35.3% — 246 213 459 53.6% 128 136 264 48.5% 44 33 77 57.1% 44 53 97 45.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilio Sanchez Fabrice Santoro
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1509 117.4 — — — — +25 +18 — 37.5% -0.75 2–2 (50%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.24
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1685 143.3 — — — — -18 -64 — 53.2% -0.15 2–7 (22%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.45
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1698 140.2 -2.94 +4.41 1.033 50.6% -23 +17 — 55.5% +0.39 8–9 (47%) 7–4 (64%) — -0.38
19 1984 1546 126.4 — — — — — +91 — 48.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.49 1992 1748 143.8 -2.09 +2.77 1.007 50.2% -63 +37 — 53.7% +0.24 7–6 (54%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.57
20 1985 1669 143.3 — — — — -164 +69 — 53.3% +0.61 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.05 1993 1632 140.6 -2.07 +2.75 0.993 49.9% +48 +70 — 46.7% -0.12 9–7 (56%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.03
21 1986 1841 151.3 — — — — -231 +97 — 64.0% +0.89 16–10 (62%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.99 1994 1737 139.2 -1.00 +3.08 1.062 51.3% -5 +10 — 56.3% +0.29 9–9 (50%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.43
22 1987 1870 151.7 — — — — -232 +179 -269 64.9% +1.14 15–5 (75%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.87 1995 1611 128.7 -2.75 +0.77 0.927 48.4% -29 +106 — 43.8% -0.57 6–11 (35%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.74
23 1988 1888 152.5 — — — — -85 +107 — 62.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.75 1996 1558 113.5 -2.78 -1.32 0.840 46.7% -8 +78 — 35.9% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.36
24 1989 1877 153.9 — — — — -20 +114 — 66.9% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.74 1997 1804 152.5 +0.69 +3.16 1.085 51.3% -35 -44 — 56.1% +0.33 11–9 (55%) 11–3 (79%) — -2.98
25 1990 1814 155.5 — — — — +57 +66 — 60.3% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.85 1998 1709 143.8 -1.02 +2.20 1.017 50.4% -3 +74 — 50.7% -0.05 10–12 (45%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.42
26 1991 1850 150.0 — — — — -33 +123 — 62.3% +0.79 8–5 (62%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.75 1999 1766 144.6 -1.34 +1.00 0.973 49.6% +38 -13 -220 56.4% +0.23 10–5 (67%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.38
27 1992 1796 147.4 — — — — +6 +100 — 58.7% +0.63 14–8 (64%) 19–19 (50%) — -0.45 2000 1740 141.2 -0.34 +2.05 1.004 50.0% +13 +19 -204 51.0% -0.11 13–8 (62%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.61
28 1993 1689 134.0 — — — — -26 +79 — 50.7% -0.16 11–12 (48%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.43 2001 1769 141.9 -1.14 +1.52 0.980 49.9% -19 +17 -124 56.3% +0.07 9–7 (56%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.40
29 1994 1630 135.6 — — — — -26 +71 — 39.4% -0.54 4–8 (33%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.30 2002 1740 141.0 -0.22 +2.22 1.064 51.1% +48 -51 -125 51.5% +0.12 10–12 (45%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.01
30 1995 1588 125.5 — — — — -13 +45 — 39.8% -0.48 4–4 (50%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.36 2003 1709 127.8 -1.70 +2.05 0.978 49.4% +20 -96 -93 45.7% -0.26 9–10 (47%) 2–6 (25%) — -0.35
31 1996 1506 114.4 — — — — +43 +56 — 31.4% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.87 2004 1816 137.3 -1.06 +1.68 0.997 49.9% -21 -159 — 50.0% +0.07 5–3 (63%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.43
32 1997 1467 97.2 — — — — — +59 — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — -0.14 2005 1781 146.7 -1.92 +3.04 0.990 49.9% +42 -184 -142 50.0% +0.01 6–5 (55%) 6–8 (43%) — -2.81
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1702 141.3 -1.28 +1.44 0.957 49.5% +11 -128 +3 48.2% -0.10 4–9 (31%) 7–8 (47%) — -2.48
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1788 144.1 +1.04 +2.02 1.074 51.2% -11 — +11 55.1% +0.11 6–9 (40%) 12–5 (71%) — -1.41
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1758 141.9 -0.13 +0.94 0.995 50.0% +37 -208 +68 49.4% -0.26 3–2 (60%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1696 134.7 -1.83 -0.14 0.922 48.5% -3 -186 +180 42.9% -0.27 6–6 (50%) 4–9 (31%) — -1.38
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1690 110.3 +0.81 +1.44 0.747 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.33 — — — -0.30
Career — 2038 151.2 — — — — -56 +97 -269 57.2% +0.54 117–85 (58%) 120–127 (49%) 97.8 -0.18 — 1890 147.6 -1.17 +2.02 1.000 50.0% +6 +5 -36 51.0% -0.01 147–150 (49%) 155–133 (54%) 103.9 -1.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.