H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Fernando Meligeni H2H: 2-2
Emilio Sanchez and Fernando Meligeni are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Meligeni won the 1995 Bogota fourth round 7-5 6-7(2) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 55
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 15, 1995* | Bogota | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| May 18, 1995* | Coral Springs | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
| May 4, 1995* | Atlanta | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Meligeni | 6-4 7-5 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1993* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 6-4 6-3 | Fernando Meligeni | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Fernando Meligeni | #675 | #25 | 1,316 | 1,888 | 185 | 199 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Fernando Meligeni | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #99 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #91 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #64 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #94 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #67 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #57 | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1999 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 2001 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #71 | 1,709 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #74 | 1,651 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #210 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |