H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Fernando Vicente H2H: 0-1
Fernando Vicente holds a 1–0 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Vicente leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Vicente won the 1996 Barcelona second round 6-4 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1996* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Vicente | 6-4 7-6(4) | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Fernando Vicente | #1,019 | #29 | 993 | 1,762 | 158 | 212 | 42.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Fernando Vicente | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #121 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1999 | 25–29 | 46.3% | #49 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 2000 | 23–31 | 42.6% | #47 | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,637 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 2002 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #58 | 1,618 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 2003 | 20–29 | 40.8% | #63 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #187 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 2005 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #110 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 2006 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 2007 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,508 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,484 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,489 | 0 | 3 |