H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 1-0
Emilio Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilio Sanchez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1995 US Open first round 6-2 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Emilio Sanchez | 6-2 6-2 6-3 | Jeremy Bates | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Jeremy Bates | #1,314 | #54 | 700 | 1,717 | 116 | 174 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Jeremy Bates | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #372 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #329 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #187 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #152 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1989 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #96 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1990 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #168 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #143 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |