H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Nuno Marques H2H: 1-2
Nuno Marques holds a 2–1 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Nuno Marques leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nuno Marques won the 1996 Mexico City third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
POR
Age 56
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 1996* | Mexico City | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Nuno Marques | 6-2 6-2 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Feb 21, 1996* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Nuno Marques | 6-4 6-4 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1995* | Estoril | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 4-6 6-4 6-3 | Nuno Marques | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Nuno Marques | #853 | #86 | 514 | 1,535 | 35 | 84 | 29.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Nuno Marques | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #219 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #158 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #151 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #281 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #90 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1996 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #125 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1997 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #220 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #349 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #706 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |