H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Pedro Rebolledo H2H: 0-2
Pedro Rebolledo holds a 2–0 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pedro Rebolledo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Pedro Rebolledo won the 1984 Palermo third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 65
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 1984* | Palermo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Pedro Rebolledo | 6-4 6-3 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1984* | Bari | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Pedro Rebolledo | 6-3 6-7 6-2 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Pedro Rebolledo | #608 | #36 | 335 | 1,801 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Pedro Rebolledo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #125 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #45 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #63 | 1,649 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #129 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #98 | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #143 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1987 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #94 | 1,657 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #140 | 1,541 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1989 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #210 | 1,558 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 1990 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #124 | 1,554 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #249 | 1,441 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |