H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Emilio Sanchez vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 1-1

Emilio Sanchez and Richey Reneberg are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on clay, while Emilio Sanchez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1995 Pinehurst round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richey Reneberg #46 6-4 6-4 Emilio Sanchez #78 Match data May 11, 1995* R32 Pinehurst ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Emilio Sanchez #17 6-7 6-4 4-6 6-4 6-1 Richey Reneberg #58 Match data Jan 7, 1990* F Wellington ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,037 406 274 59.7% 0 1 0 1 13 15
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilio Sanchez Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,669 0 0 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,840 0 3 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0
23 1988 40–20 66.7% #17 1,887 0 8 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0
24 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,877 0 9 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,814 0 11 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1
26 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,849 0 14 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1992 43–26 62.3% #21 1,795 0 15 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2
28 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,688 0 15 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,630 0 15 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2
30 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,588 0 15 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3
31 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3
32 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilio Sanchez Richey Reneberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 15 11 26 57.7% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 43 12 55 78.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1987 8 9 17 47.1% 41 9 50 82.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1988 14 7 21 66.7% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1989 16 6 22 72.7% 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1990 15 4 19 78.9% 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5% 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1992 19 7 26 73.1% 22 13 35 62.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 23 16 39 59.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 13 18 31 41.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 1997 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 74 178 58.4% 280 159 439 63.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 18 33 51 35.3% — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilio Sanchez Richey Reneberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1984 1546 126.4 — — — — — +91 — 48.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +1.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1669 143.3 — — — — -164 +69 — 53.3% +0.61 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.05 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23
21 1986 1841 151.3 — — — — -231 +97 — 64.0% +0.89 16–10 (62%) 12–6 (67%) — -0.99 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.09
22 1987 1870 151.7 — — — — -232 +179 -269 64.9% +1.14 15–5 (75%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.87 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) — -2.96
23 1988 1888 152.5 — — — — -85 +107 — 62.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.75 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) — -2.41
24 1989 1877 153.9 — — — — -20 +114 — 66.9% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -1.74 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.36
25 1990 1814 155.5 — — — — +57 +66 — 60.3% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.85 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) — +1.77
26 1991 1850 150.0 — — — — -33 +123 — 62.3% +0.79 8–5 (62%) 14–12 (54%) — -0.75 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) — +0.14
27 1992 1796 147.4 — — — — +6 +100 — 58.7% +0.63 14–8 (64%) 19–19 (50%) — -0.45 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.80
28 1993 1689 134.0 — — — — -26 +79 — 50.7% -0.16 11–12 (48%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.43 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) — -0.33
29 1994 1630 135.6 — — — — -26 +71 — 39.4% -0.54 4–8 (33%) 6–10 (38%) — -1.30 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) — -2.47
30 1995 1588 125.5 — — — — -13 +45 — 39.8% -0.48 4–4 (50%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.36 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) — -3.44
31 1996 1506 114.4 — — — — +43 +56 — 31.4% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.87 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.18
32 1997 1467 97.2 — — — — — +59 — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — -0.14 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10
Career — 2038 151.2 — — — — -56 +97 -269 57.2% +0.54 117–85 (58%) 120–127 (49%) 97.8 -0.18 — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.