H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Stefano Pescosolido H2H: 1-2
Stefano Pescosolido holds a 2–1 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Stefano Pescosolido leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Stefano Pescosolido won the 1995 Kitzbuhel third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1995* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Stefano Pescosolido | 6-4 6-4 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Apr 23, 1992* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 3-6 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | Stefano Pescosolido | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1992* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Stefano Pescosolido | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Stefano Pescosolido | #1,500 | #42 | 781 | 1,763 | 107 | 155 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Stefano Pescosolido | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #225 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #141 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #65 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #113 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #68 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,467 | 0 | 2 |