H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 0-2
Tim Mayotte holds a 2–0 lead over Emilio Sanchez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tim Mayotte won the 1989 Indian Wells fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1989* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Tim Mayotte | 7-5 6-2 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
| Oct 31, 1986* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Tim Mayotte | 6-1 6-1 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Tim Mayotte | #1,103 | #7 | 1,274 | 2,047 | 333 | 194 | 63.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Tim Mayotte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #420 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #33 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,809 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1983 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #16 | 1,902 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1984 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #44 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 48–19 | 71.6% | #12 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1986 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1987 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #9 | 1,981 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1988 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #10 | 1,909 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1989 | 29–15 | 65.9% | #13 | 1,913 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 1990 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #37 | 1,745 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #115 | 1,716 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,698 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |