H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Todd Witsken H2H: 2-0
Emilio Sanchez holds a 2–0 lead over Todd Witsken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1987 US Open second round 6-1 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Emilio Sanchez | 6-1 6-4 6-3 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
| May 28, 1986* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 1-6 2-6 6-2 6-1 6-1 | Todd Witsken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Todd Witsken | #1,205 | #43 | 568 | 1,780 | 115 | 135 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilio Sanchez | Todd Witsken | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #358 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #676 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #55 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #158 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1989 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 1990 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #110 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 1992 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #104 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #275 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |