H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Emilio Sanchez vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 2-1

Emilio Sanchez holds a 2–1 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 2–0 on clay, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Todd Woodbridge won the 1994 Dubai Tennis Championships round of 32 6-2 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilio Sanchez
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Todd Woodbridge
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Todd Woodbridge #101 6-2 7-6(4) Emilio Sanchez #42 Match data Feb 3, 1994* R32 Dubai Tennis Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Emilio Sanchez #25 6-1 7-6(1) 6-2 Todd Woodbridge #52 Match data Jul 31, 1992* R64 Barcelona Olympics Olympics Clay
Emilio Sanchez #16 6-1 6-1 Todd Woodbridge #40 Match data May 15, 1991* R64 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilio Sanchez #1,301 #7 1,634 2,037 406 274 59.7% 0 1 0 1 13 15
Todd Woodbridge #1,151 #19 1,575 1,870 239 231 50.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilio Sanchez Todd Woodbridge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1988 1–6 14.3% #213 1,453 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–6 50.0% #131 1,573 0 0
19 1984 9–12 42.9% #111 1,546 0 0 1990 16–17 48.5% #50 1,704 0 0
20 1985 16–14 53.3% #64 1,669 0 0 1991 23–25 47.9% #77 1,703 0 0
21 1986 52–23 69.3% #16 1,840 0 3 1992 25–23 52.1% #54 1,675 0 0
22 1987 56–23 70.9% #17 1,870 0 7 1993 19–20 48.7% #109 1,665 0 0
23 1988 40–20 66.7% #17 1,887 0 8 1994 15–19 44.1% #90 1,662 0 0
24 1989 37–16 69.8% #19 1,877 0 9 1995 32–22 59.3% #33 1,811 0 1
25 1990 48–24 66.7% #8 1,814 0 11 1996 34–24 58.6% #36 1,754 0 1
26 1991 40–22 64.5% #14 1,849 0 14 1997 31–20 60.8% #26 1,801 0 2
27 1992 43–26 62.3% #21 1,795 0 15 1998 21–21 50.0% #65 1,716 0 2
28 1993 28–26 51.9% #41 1,688 0 15 1999 8–16 33.3% #197 1,602 0 2
29 1994 17–26 39.5% #74 1,630 0 15 2000 4–6 40.0% #187 1,588 0 2
30 1995 13–22 37.1% #108 1,588 0 15 2001 4–6 40.0% #207 1,597 0 2
31 1996 7–16 30.4% #173 1,505 0 15 — — — — — — —
32 1997 0–4 0.0% #1056 1,467 0 15 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilio Sanchez Todd Woodbridge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 15 11 26 57.7% — — — — — — — — 1991 14 13 27 51.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
21 1986 4 4 8 50.0% 43 12 55 78.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1992 17 13 30 56.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 1987 8 9 17 47.1% 41 9 50 82.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1993 14 13 27 51.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 14 7 21 66.7% 25 10 35 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 6 9 15 40.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1989 16 6 22 72.7% 21 9 30 70.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 4 13 69.2% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1990 15 4 19 78.9% 28 12 40 70.0% — — — — 5 8 13 38.5% 1996 20 13 33 60.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1991 15 10 25 60.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1997 22 12 34 64.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1992 19 7 26 73.1% 22 13 35 62.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1998 10 10 20 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 5 10 50.0%
28 1993 5 9 14 35.7% 23 16 39 59.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 10 16 37.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
29 1994 4 7 11 36.4% 13 18 31 41.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 12 18 30 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 1996 2 4 6 33.3% 5 11 16 31.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 74 178 58.4% 280 159 439 63.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 18 33 51 35.3% — 146 131 277 52.7% 21 32 53 39.6% 43 31 74 58.1% 29 37 66 43.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilio Sanchez Todd Woodbridge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1453 103.4 — — — — +59 — — 21.1% -1.53 — 0–1 — +0.38
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1573 126.2 — — — — +14 — — 44.1% -0.68 2–0 5–2 (71%) — -0.39
19 1984 1546 126.4 — — — — — +91 — 48.1% -0.09 2–4 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 97.9 +1.49 1990 1705 141.6 — — — — +26 -177 — 47.3% -0.16 8–7 (53%) 8–5 (62%) 106.3 -0.46
20 1985 1669 143.3 — — — — -164 +69 — 53.3% +0.61 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 +0.05 1991 1704 135.7 -0.60 +1.97 0.996 49.9% -11 -147 -95 48.4% -0.03 5–3 (63%) 9–8 (53%) 102.3 -0.95
21 1986 1841 151.3 — — — — -231 +97 — 64.0% +0.89 16–10 (62%) 12–6 (67%) 106.7 -0.99 1992 1676 141.7 -0.77 +2.88 1.047 51.0% +48 -130 -62 49.2% +0.12 9–8 (53%) 11–13 (46%) 101.7 -0.18
22 1987 1870 151.7 — — — — -232 +179 -269 64.9% +1.14 15–5 (75%) 12–12 (50%) 107.0 +0.87 1993 1665 133.1 -2.39 +1.69 0.971 49.6% +31 -91 -53 46.4% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 99.9 -0.10
23 1988 1888 152.5 — — — — -85 +107 — 62.4% +1.00 12–6 (67%) 8–12 (40%) 98.8 -0.75 1994 1662 123.5 -1.35 -0.55 0.931 48.8% +6 -162 +27 46.2% -0.19 9–8 (53%) 8–10 (44%) 100.1 +1.36
24 1989 1877 153.9 — — — — -20 +114 — 66.9% +1.16 7–7 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 93.2 -1.74 1995 1811 136.8 +0.19 +0.89 0.983 49.6% -41 -183 -91 54.0% +0.06 6–6 (50%) 13–7 (65%) 104.8 -2.85
25 1990 1814 155.5 — — — — +57 +66 — 60.3% +0.79 18–8 (69%) 12–11 (52%) 103.2 +0.85 1996 1754 142.3 -1.66 +2.21 0.980 49.9% +8 -93 +11 56.4% +0.32 7–4 (64%) 16–12 (57%) 105.8 +0.28
26 1991 1850 150.0 — — — — -33 +123 — 62.3% +0.79 8–5 (62%) 14–12 (54%) 98.9 -0.75 1997 1801 143.6 -0.92 +3.35 1.040 50.8% -19 -148 +69 58.1% +0.40 7–5 (58%) 12–9 (57%) 102.4 -0.11
27 1992 1796 147.4 — — — — +6 +100 — 58.7% +0.63 14–8 (64%) 19–19 (50%) 96.5 -0.45 1998 1717 136.8 -3.37 +1.99 0.923 48.5% +12 -51 +123 46.8% -0.22 12–2 (86%) 6–12 (33%) 100.6 -0.66
28 1993 1689 134.0 — — — — -26 +79 — 50.7% -0.16 11–12 (48%) 12–12 (50%) 96.3 +0.43 1999 1603 123.7 -0.75 -0.98 0.870 47.8% +69 -37 +208 35.5% -0.95 4–4 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 +0.58
29 1994 1630 135.6 — — — — -26 +71 — 39.4% -0.54 4–8 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 94.1 -1.30 2000 1589 116.3 -2.34 +1.34 0.976 49.6% +38 — — 48.3% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.9 -0.13
30 1995 1588 125.5 — — — — -13 +45 — 39.8% -0.48 4–4 (50%) 6–13 (32%) 97.2 +0.36 2001 1598 112.4 -2.79 +0.59 0.950 48.9% -17 — +231 43.3% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.55
31 1996 1506 114.4 — — — — +43 +56 — 31.4% -1.29 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.9 +0.87 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1467 97.2 — — — — — +59 — 11.1% -3.22 0–1 — — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2038 151.2 — — — — -56 +97 -269 57.2% +0.54 117–85 (58%) 120–127 (49%) 97.8 -0.18 — 1870 141.5 -1.32 +1.70 0.980 49.7% +10 -122 +24 49.1% -0.07 79–58 (58%) 102–93 (52%) 106.9 -0.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.