H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Emilio Sanchez vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 1-1
Emilio Sanchez and Vincent Spadea are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emilio Sanchez leads 1–0 on clay, while Vincent Spadea leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilio Sanchez won the 1995 Montevideo third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 1995* | Montevideo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Emilio Sanchez | 7-5 7-5 | Vincent Spadea | Match data |
| Sep 1, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Vincent Spadea | 6-1 7-6(7) 6-3 | Emilio Sanchez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | #1,301 | #7 | 1,634 | 2,038 | 402 | 272 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 15 |
| Vincent Spadea | #1,474 | #18 | 1,629 | 1,876 | 310 | 348 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Emilio Sanchez | Vincent Spadea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1984 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #303 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #64 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #75 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #16 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #81 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 56–23 | 70.9% | #17 | 1,870 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #54 | 1,711 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 39–19 | 67.2% | #17 | 1,907 | 0 | 8 | 1997 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #88 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 37–16 | 69.8% | #19 | 1,871 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #42 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,812 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #20 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,823 | 0 | 14 | 2000 | 3–23 | 11.5% | #213 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 40–25 | 61.5% | #21 | 1,783 | 0 | 15 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #125 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,686 | 0 | 15 | 2002 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #67 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #74 | 1,628 | 0 | 15 | 2003 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #29 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,587 | 0 | 15 | 2004 | 39–25 | 60.9% | #20 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #173 | 1,505 | 0 | 15 | 2005 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #75 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1056 | 1,467 | 0 | 15 | 2006 | 19–26 | 42.2% | #73 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 24–28 | 46.2% | #77 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #76 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #295 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1517 | 1,480 | 0 | 1 |