H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Ernests Gulbis vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0
Ernests Gulbis holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ernests Gulbis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ernests Gulbis won the 2013 St. Petersburg semifinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
LAT
Age 37
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2013* | St. Petersburg | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Ernests Gulbis | 6-3 6-3 | Michal Przysiezny | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ernests Gulbis | #893 | #10 | 2,725 | 2,139 | 221 | 232 | 48.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Michal Przysiezny | #1,345 | #57 | 810 | 1,784 | 19 | 58 | 24.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Ernests Gulbis | Michal Przysiezny | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #141 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #339 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #61 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #257 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #53 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #256 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #90 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #609 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #24 | 1,845 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #61 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #86 | 1,438 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #136 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #306 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #24 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #66 | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #13 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 4–17 | 19.0% | #174 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #81 | 1,765 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #151 | 1,785 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #428 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #199 | 1,716 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #95 | 1,813 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #226 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #181 | 1,562 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,509 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |