H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Evgeny Donskoy vs Michael Russell H2H: 1-0
Evgeny Donskoy holds a 1–0 lead over Michael Russell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeny Donskoy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeny Donskoy won the 2014 Indian Wells Masters second round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2014* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Evgeny Donskoy | 6-4 6-3 | Michael Russell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeny Donskoy | #1,380 | #65 | 764 | 1,791 | 50 | 111 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Michael Russell | #1,124 | #60 | 693 | 1,810 | 77 | 149 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeny Donskoy | Michael Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #514 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #155 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #87 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #157 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #502 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #125 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #82 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #123 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #242 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #172 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #83 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #99 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #158 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #557 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |