H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Evgeny Donskoy vs Somdev Devvarman H2H: 0-1
Somdev Devvarman holds a 1–0 lead over Evgeny Donskoy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Somdev Devvarman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Somdev Devvarman won the 2013 Miami Masters first round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 36
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
IND
Age 41
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Q2 | Clay | Evgeny Donskoy | 6-2 6-4 | Somdev Devvarman | Match data |
| Mar 22, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Somdev Devvarman | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | Evgeny Donskoy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evgeny Donskoy | #1,380 | #65 | 764 | 1,791 | 50 | 111 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Somdev Devvarman | #1,347 | #62 | 771 | 1,799 | 49 | 70 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Evgeny Donskoy | Somdev Devvarman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #514 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #472 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #259 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #144 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1116 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1033 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2013 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #113 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #204 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #126 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #108 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #125 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #84 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #72 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #664 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #97 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #90 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #138 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #123 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #172 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #909 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |