H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Evgeny Korolev vs Frederico Gil H2H: 1-0

Evgeny Korolev holds a 1–0 lead over Frederico Gil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Evgeny Korolev leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Evgeny Korolev won the 2010 New Haven round of 64 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Evgeny Korolev
KAZ Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Frederico Gil
POR Age 41 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Evgeny Korolev #73 6-4 6-2 Frederico Gil Match data Aug 24, 2010* R64 New Haven ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Evgeny Korolev #1,762 #46 1,012 1,793 72 92 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Frederico Gil — — — 1,782 — — — 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Evgeny Korolev Frederico Gil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 8–8 50.0% #103 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2007 20–24 45.5% #80 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2008 13–17 43.3% #106 1,679 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2009 17–17 50.0% #53 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2010 12–20 37.5% #140 1,666 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2012 1–3 25.0% #211 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2013 1–3 25.0% #329 1,608 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Evgeny Korolev Frederico Gil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2006 2 1 3 66.7% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 14 15 29 48.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 7 9 16 43.8% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 14 10 24 58.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
22 2010 10 10 20 50.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2007 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2009 8 6 14 57.1% 7 9 16 43.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2010 1 7 8 12.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 6 9 33.3% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 47 47 94 50.0% 22 32 54 40.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — 16 24 40 40.0% 32 35 67 47.8% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 164/164 of Evgeny Korolev's and 114/115 of Frederico Gil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Evgeny Korolev Frederico Gil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2006 16/16 5.1 4.6 58.5% 73.4% 48.5% 66.9% 41.2% 62.9% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 44/44 5.0 3.3 57.4% 67.7% 45.9% 53.6% 42.4% 58.7% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 30/30 4.4 4.2 58.7% 69.1% 45.1% 61.9% 33.7% 59.6% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 34/34 5.8 2.5 60.4% 73.3% 49.8% 47.8% 48.0% 63.7% 36.5% 2006 2/3 1.0 0.5 77.9% 57.4% 37.0% 66.7% 25.0% 53.5% 36.2%
22 2010 32/32 4.6 3.9 55.5% 68.6% 46.2% 53.1% 44.2% 58.9% 37.8% 2007 3/3 2.3 2.3 62.3% 62.4% 51.3% 37.5% 35.0% 58.3% 36.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 6/6 3.0 2.7 68.3% 67.6% 51.0% 65.9% 36.3% 62.0% 35.0%
24 2012 4/4 4.3 3.5 57.7% 68.0% 44.5% 42.1% 24.2% 58.0% 38.0% 2009 33/33 3.1 2.3 61.2% 68.2% 50.7% 55.6% 44.1% 61.5% 36.6%
25 2013 4/4 2.0 4.0 54.7% 65.6% 43.7% 27.1% 11.5% 54.5% 22.0% 2010 21/21 2.1 2.0 66.6% 59.7% 47.4% 54.7% 43.4% 55.5% 36.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 27/27 2.3 1.9 64.6% 63.7% 47.7% 51.8% 41.4% 57.9% 38.3%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 22/22 1.7 1.9 62.8% 64.7% 50.9% 56.4% 41.3% 59.4% 37.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Evgeny Korolev Frederico Gil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2006 1614 127.8 +0.28 +0.04 1.003 50.4% -58 +39 — 51.1% +0.02 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.6 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2007 1681 129.7 -3.44 -1.27 0.850 47.3% +4 -32 -173 43.3% -0.66 10–5 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 103.6 -2.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2008 1679 123.9 -2.52 +0.94 0.901 48.4% -19 -14 — 43.5% -0.65 4–4 (50%) 6–3 (67%) 101.9 -1.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2009 1730 138.6 +0.09 +0.28 1.007 50.2% +46 -47 -263 51.2% -0.02 6–6 (50%) 12–5 (71%) 103.4 +1.26 2006 1539 103.7 +0.35 +0.51 0.779 46.2% — +27 — 50.0% -0.75 2–0 1–0 — -0.19
22 2010 1666 132.3 -3.23 +1.40 0.920 48.5% +87 -105 -198 45.3% -0.31 2–5 (29%) 4–6 (40%) 94.7 -1.58 2007 1593 115.1 +0.47 -1.50 0.868 47.1% — +24 — 37.5% -0.25 1–1 0–2 — -0.26
23 2011 1548 95.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1624 117.9 -1.81 +1.60 0.920 48.5% — +37 — 38.9% -0.67 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.04
24 2012 1624 120.7 -1.32 -0.40 0.906 48.4% — — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 1–0 — +0.19 2009 1656 139.8 -1.33 -0.33 0.951 49.1% +1 +25 -42 45.0% -0.32 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) 105.0 -0.88
25 2013 1609 109.9 -3.36 -2.25 0.485 39.9% — +47 — 33.3% -1.50 — 1–0 — -0.32 2010 1613 122.3 -4.71 -0.35 0.816 46.3% -32 +111 — 36.7% -0.86 5–2 (71%) 3–3 (50%) 106.2 +0.07
26 2014 1566 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1624 132.4 -2.73 +0.39 0.910 48.2% +26 +81 — 37.7% -0.71 4–6 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 95.4 -0.33
27 2015 1561 100.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1610 123.8 -2.31 +0.07 0.921 48.6% +64 +46 — 41.2% -0.57 4–2 (67%) 1–3 (25%) 100.7 +0.42
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1572 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1536 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1534 104.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1542 97.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1794 131.2 -2.08 +0.10 0.908 48.5% +24 -23 -210 45.9% -0.39 26–26 (50%) 35–31 (53%) 103.7 -2.79 — 1783 130.2 -2.42 0.00 0.901 48.1% +13 +59 -42 40.6% -0.59 23–15 (61%) 15–20 (43%) 104.8 -0.98

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.