H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 3-2

Fabio Fognini holds a 3–2 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 2–1 on clay, while Fabio Fognini leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 4-6 3-1 RET.

ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 19, 2016* Rio de Janeiro ATP 250 R16 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #118 4-6 3-1 (ret.) Fabio Fognini #24 Match data
Sep 22, 2012* St. Petersburg ATP 250 SF Hard Fabio Fognini #53 6-3 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #93 Match data
Nov 3, 2011* Valencia ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabio Fognini #44 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #94 Match data
Sep 24, 2009* Bucharest ATP 250 R32 Clay Fabio Fognini #87 1-6 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #108 Match data
Apr 22, 2009* Barcelona ATP 500 R64 Clay Daniel Gimeno-Traver #83 6-1 6-3 Fabio Fognini #84 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,640 0 0
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,732 0 0
25 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,625 0 0
29 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,609 0 0
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,684 0 0
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,630 0 0
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,611 0 0
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9
34 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9