H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver H2H: 3-2

Fabio Fognini holds a 3–2 lead over Daniel Gimeno-Traver in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Daniel Gimeno-Traver leads 2–1 on clay, while Fabio Fognini leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniel Gimeno-Traver won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro round of 16 4-6 3-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #118 4-6 3-1 (ret.) Fabio Fognini #24 Match data Feb 19, 2016* R16 Rio de Janeiro ATP 500 Clay
Fabio Fognini #53 6-3 6-4 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #93 Match data Sep 22, 2012* SF St. Petersburg ATP 250 Hard
Fabio Fognini #44 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #94 Match data Nov 3, 2011* R32 Valencia ATP 500 Hard
Fabio Fognini #87 1-6 6-4 6-3 Daniel Gimeno-Traver #108 Match data Sep 24, 2009* R32 Tiriac Open ATP 250 Clay
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #83 6-1 6-3 Fabio Fognini #84 Match data Apr 22, 2009* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 402 385 51.1% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,601 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,614 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,703 0 0 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,728 0 0 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2012 21–24 46.7% #45 1,764 0 0 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,933 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2016 25–22 53.2% #49 1,871 0 4 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,946 0 5 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,943 0 8 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,908 0 9 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,799 0 9 — — — — — — —
34 2021 20–22 47.6% #37 1,773 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,703 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,678 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabio Fognini Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — —
21 2008 4 7 11 36.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2011 5 14 19 26.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — — 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 10 10 20 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 27 10 37 73.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2015 9 12 21 42.9% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
30 2017 18 11 29 62.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2018 22 12 34 64.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2019 13 12 25 52.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 8 12 20 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151 178 329 45.9% 226 180 406 55.7% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 775/787 of Fabio Fognini's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fabio Fognini Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 1/1 2.0 6.0 69.1% 64.2% 50.0% 55.6% 30.0% 59.8% 35.6% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2006 7/7 2.1 2.9 53.1% 65.4% 47.5% 44.2% 54.7% 56.9% 37.3% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2007 12/12 4.5 3.8 52.0% 68.2% 44.3% 53.3% 45.5% 56.6% 35.3% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2008 33/33 3.2 3.9 54.6% 69.4% 46.0% 55.5% 46.4% 58.6% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 43/43 3.2 4.0 58.2% 64.4% 45.3% 49.8% 44.0% 56.5% 37.7% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2010 39/39 2.9 4.8 58.7% 64.9% 43.6% 50.5% 38.7% 56.0% 38.5% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2011 49/50 3.0 4.6 58.7% 66.2% 45.3% 51.7% 47.8% 57.6% 39.8% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2012 44/45 2.4 3.0 65.6% 63.4% 48.6% 53.6% 47.1% 58.2% 38.1% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2013 67/67 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.9% 49.6% 55.8% 45.5% 59.9% 41.2% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2014 60/60 3.4 4.0 59.2% 68.8% 48.1% 51.1% 45.7% 60.2% 38.1% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2015 55/55 3.4 3.6 58.4% 69.0% 49.3% 57.5% 40.8% 60.8% 39.2% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2016 44/47 3.4 4.4 56.0% 69.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.7% 61.1% 39.6% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2017 58/58 3.3 4.7 58.8% 69.1% 49.8% 57.4% 42.8% 61.2% 38.8% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2018 64/66 3.8 3.5 61.8% 68.9% 52.7% 55.6% 48.5% 62.7% 40.5% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2019 51/52 3.9 3.7 60.7% 67.9% 49.0% 53.2% 42.9% 60.3% 38.7% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
33 2020 12/12 5.3 4.2 54.5% 67.7% 51.4% 46.1% 48.4% 60.1% 34.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 39/42 3.0 4.3 60.1% 68.4% 48.4% 54.2% 44.8% 60.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 42/43 3.3 4.5 59.3% 65.9% 49.0% 57.2% 40.1% 58.9% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 22/22 2.9 4.7 60.4% 65.4% 46.8% 49.6% 43.0% 58.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 26/26 4.4 4.8 57.8% 67.4% 45.6% 49.9% 43.4% 58.0% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 7/7 0.7 5.4 51.9% 62.0% 49.9% 43.4% 24.9% 56.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 775/787 3.3 4.0 59.0% 67.3% 48.4% 53.5% 44.2% 59.5% 38.6% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabio Fognini Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1482 99.2 +0.23 -1.18 0.887 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2006 1477 110.3 -2.63 +0.34 0.866 47.3% — +31 — 35.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 100.8 -0.26 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2007 1602 117.2 -2.15 -0.69 0.814 46.3% -46 +18 — 44.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 99.0 +0.25 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2008 1615 127.2 -3.14 +0.45 0.925 48.6% -103 +155 — 43.4% -0.61 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) 98.2 +0.15 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2009 1716 132.0 -5.36 +0.55 0.866 47.2% -159 +131 -181 37.4% -1.01 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 102.3 -0.90 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2010 1704 131.6 -5.15 +1.23 0.875 47.4% -88 +13 -98 37.7% -0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–6 (50%) 104.7 -0.82 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2011 1728 142.9 -3.68 +1.72 0.937 48.9% -115 +73 — 48.0% -0.26 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) 100.6 +0.45 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2012 1764 140.0 -3.89 +1.02 0.912 48.4% -75 +8 -38 46.2% -0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–5 (67%) 109.7 +0.35 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2013 1933 165.8 -1.81 +4.34 1.027 50.6% -168 +182 -226 58.3% +0.36 13–11 (54%) 13–9 (59%) 105.6 -0.89 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2014 1824 155.2 -2.34 +1.83 0.959 49.1% -21 +165 -68 56.4% +0.07 14–5 (74%) 11–4 (73%) 107.7 +2.30 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2015 1908 159.9 -1.81 +2.86 1.001 50.0% -62 +90 — 51.4% +0.05 12–5 (71%) 9–11 (45%) 106.5 +0.93 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2016 1871 155.5 -1.25 +2.39 1.019 50.5% -16 +34 — 52.5% +0.19 10–9 (53%) 8–9 (47%) 97.1 +0.07 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2017 1946 159.9 -1.21 +2.19 1.002 50.1% -11 -23 -165 56.7% +0.10 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) 109.2 -0.17 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2018 1944 156.4 -0.63 +3.84 1.087 51.6% -12 +56 -127 60.8% +0.58 16–8 (67%) 7–8 (47%) 102.3 +2.85 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2019 1908 157.6 -2.55 +2.86 0.977 49.6% -19 +81 -89 53.8% +0.05 9–5 (64%) 12–8 (60%) 104.4 +0.99 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 2020 1799 125.0 -2.89 -0.42 0.870 47.4% +50 +60 — 39.5% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 99.0 +0.27 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1773 149.5 -1.39 +0.94 0.972 49.6% +28 +52 +62 52.7% -0.02 4–9 (31%) 13–7 (65%) 99.3 +1.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1703 141.0 -3.90 +0.04 0.885 48.0% +22 +76 — 45.5% -0.40 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.8 +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1692 133.5 -4.24 +2.71 0.941 48.7% -31 +89 — 47.4% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 8–1 (89%) 101.7 -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1679 121.5 -3.83 -1.47 0.833 46.6% -78 +120 +144 44.9% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1579 103.9 -1.49 -2.36 0.717 43.9% — +125 +163 21.1% -2.10 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2033 153.0 -2.64 +1.84 0.954 49.2% -46 +84 -49 50.2% -0.15 151–117 (56%) 154–119 (56%) 109.2 +0.90 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.