H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Jeremy Chardy H2H: 3-2

Fabio Fognini holds a 3–2 lead over Jeremy Chardy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jeremy Chardy leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Fabio Fognini leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jeremy Chardy won the 2021 Antalya fourth round 7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(5).

ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
FRA Age 39 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 9, 2021* Antalya ATP 250 R16 Hard Jeremy Chardy #72 7-6(4) 6-7(1) 7-6(5) Fabio Fognini #17 Match data
Mar 11, 2018* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jeremy Chardy #100 4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 Fabio Fognini #19 Match data
Mar 27, 2017* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Fabio Fognini #40 3-6 6-4 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #77 Match data
Jul 30, 2015* Hamburg ATP 500 R32 Clay Fabio Fognini #32 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 Jeremy Chardy #44 Match data
Feb 8, 2014* Vina Del Mar ATP 250 QF Clay Fabio Fognini #15 6-4 3-6 6-2 Jeremy Chardy #44 Match data
Aug 12, 2012 Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 Q2 Q Hard Fabio Fognini #66 3-6 6-1 7-6(5) Jeremy Chardy #47 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 398 382 51.0% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Jeremy Chardy #1,077 #25 1,486 1,968 290 303 48.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Jeremy Chardy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #261 1,547 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,600 0 0 2007 0–3 0.0% #192 1,563 0 0
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,612 0 0 2008 10–9 52.6% #75 1,680 0 0
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2009 34–28 54.8% #32 1,780 0 1
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,702 0 0 2010 24–28 46.2% #45 1,827 0 1
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,725 0 0 2011 8–18 30.8% #103 1,728 0 1
25 2012 21–23 47.7% #45 1,763 0 0 2012 24–20 54.5% #32 1,822 0 1
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,932 0 2 2013 22–25 46.8% #34 1,797 0 1
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2014 33–27 55.0% #29 1,859 0 1
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2015 27–27 50.0% #31 1,896 0 1
29 2016 23–21 52.3% #49 1,864 0 4 2016 17–21 44.7% #69 1,752 0 1
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,945 0 5 2017 17–21 44.7% #78 1,784 0 1
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,949 0 8 2018 24–21 53.3% #40 1,830 0 1
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,911 0 9 2019 28–27 50.9% #51 1,918 0 1
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,800 0 9 2020 2–5 28.6% #75 1,786 0 1
34 2021 18–21 46.2% #37 1,766 0 9 2021 17–17 50.0% #107 1,774 0 1
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,700 0 9
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,690 0 9 2023 1–4 20.0% #519 1,718 0 1
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,675 0 9
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,577 0 9