H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Fabio Fognini vs Lukas Lacko H2H: 2-0

Fabio Fognini holds a 2–0 lead over Lukas Lacko in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Fabio Fognini leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Fabio Fognini won the 2018 Stockholm Open second round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Fabio Fognini
ITA Age 39 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Lukas Lacko
SVK Age 38 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fabio Fognini #14 6-4 6-4 Lukas Lacko #81 Match data Oct 19, 2018* R16 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Fabio Fognini #14 6-4 6-4 Lukas Lacko #105 Match data Mar 22, 2014* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Fabio Fognini #188 #9 2,920 2,033 402 385 51.1% 0 1 0 1 7 9
Lukas Lacko #1,505 #44 917 1,838 81 135 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Fabio Fognini Lukas Lacko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2005 0–1 0.0% #305 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2006 2–5 28.6% #247 1,476 0 0 2007 0–2 0.0% #139 1,499 0 0
20 2007 5–7 41.7% #95 1,601 0 0 2008 0–1 0.0% #325 1,480 0 0
21 2008 16–17 48.5% #88 1,614 0 0 2009 1–3 25.0% #82 1,607 0 0
22 2009 17–26 39.5% #54 1,716 0 0 2010 16–21 43.2% #89 1,669 0 0
23 2010 14–25 35.9% #55 1,703 0 0 2011 4–7 36.4% #112 1,670 0 0
24 2011 22–28 44.0% #48 1,728 0 0 2012 12–19 38.7% #51 1,644 0 0
25 2012 21–24 46.7% #45 1,764 0 0 2013 11–16 40.7% #81 1,667 0 0
26 2013 41–26 61.2% #16 1,933 0 2 2014 11–17 39.3% #94 1,733 0 0
27 2014 36–24 60.0% #20 1,823 0 3 2015 2–12 14.3% #110 1,647 0 0
28 2015 30–25 54.5% #21 1,908 0 3 2016 4–7 36.4% #122 1,682 0 0
29 2016 25–22 53.2% #49 1,871 0 4 2017 7–10 41.2% #92 1,740 0 0
30 2017 35–23 60.3% #27 1,946 0 5 2018 11–16 40.7% #114 1,677 0 0
31 2018 44–22 66.7% #13 1,943 0 8 2019 1–3 25.0% #183 1,579 0 0
32 2019 30–22 57.7% #12 1,908 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2020 4–8 33.3% #17 1,799 0 9 2021 1–1 50.0% #190 1,497 0 0
34 2021 20–22 47.6% #37 1,773 0 9 — — — — — — —
35 2022 19–24 44.2% #55 1,703 0 9 — — — — — — —
36 2023 9–13 40.9% #107 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
37 2024 12–14 46.2% #91 1,678 0 9 — — — — — — —
38 2025 0–7 0.0% #188 1,579 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Fabio Fognini Lukas Lacko
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2007 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 4 7 11 36.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2009 2 8 10 20.0% 14 15 29 48.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2010 12 14 26 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
23 2010 3 9 12 25.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2011 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 5 14 19 26.3% 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — — — — — 2012 9 12 21 42.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
25 2012 8 11 19 42.1% 10 10 20 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2013 11 13 24 45.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2013 12 14 26 46.2% 27 10 37 73.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 9 13 22 40.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 21 11 32 65.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2015 1 8 9 11.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
28 2015 9 12 21 42.9% 20 12 32 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2016 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2016 13 12 25 52.0% 11 9 20 55.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2017 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2017 18 11 29 62.1% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2018 6 13 19 31.6% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
31 2018 22 12 34 64.7% 20 9 29 69.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2019 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2019 13 12 25 52.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 2021 10 12 22 45.5% 7 8 15 46.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 8 12 20 40.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 3 6 9 33.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 2 7 9 22.2% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 151 178 329 45.9% 226 180 406 55.7% 25 26 51 49.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 60 95 155 38.7% 2 14 16 12.5% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 775/787 of Fabio Fognini's and 215/216 of Lukas Lacko's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Fabio Fognini Lukas Lacko
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 1/1 2.0 6.0 69.1% 64.2% 50.0% 55.6% 30.0% 59.8% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 7/7 2.1 2.9 53.1% 65.4% 47.5% 44.2% 54.7% 56.9% 37.3% 2007 2/2 3.0 3.0 58.5% 59.7% 48.3% 32.1% 8.3% 55.0% 22.6%
20 2007 12/12 4.5 3.8 52.0% 68.2% 44.3% 53.3% 45.5% 56.6% 35.3% 2008 1/1 8.0 7.0 54.5% 70.9% 47.0% 64.7% 28.6% 60.0% 31.1%
21 2008 33/33 3.2 3.9 54.6% 69.4% 46.0% 55.5% 46.4% 58.6% 38.2% 2009 4/4 5.5 2.0 64.4% 71.7% 48.3% 67.5% 21.5% 63.4% 24.6%
22 2009 43/43 3.2 4.0 58.2% 64.4% 45.3% 49.8% 44.0% 56.5% 37.7% 2010 37/37 6.7 2.6 58.6% 72.6% 50.4% 55.4% 41.7% 63.4% 36.0%
23 2010 39/39 2.9 4.8 58.7% 64.9% 43.6% 50.5% 38.7% 56.0% 38.5% 2011 11/11 6.2 3.4 57.9% 66.4% 48.8% 61.5% 49.0% 59.2% 32.9%
24 2011 49/50 3.0 4.6 58.7% 66.2% 45.3% 51.7% 47.8% 57.6% 39.8% 2012 30/31 6.3 2.0 60.2% 68.3% 49.2% 50.9% 38.9% 60.9% 34.2%
25 2012 44/45 2.4 3.0 65.6% 63.4% 48.6% 53.6% 47.1% 58.2% 38.1% 2013 27/27 5.7 2.8 57.8% 68.4% 48.1% 53.4% 37.5% 59.7% 35.6%
26 2013 67/67 2.7 3.2 59.2% 66.9% 49.6% 55.8% 45.5% 59.9% 41.2% 2014 28/28 4.9 2.6 57.9% 72.2% 50.4% 46.3% 46.3% 63.1% 33.4%
27 2014 60/60 3.4 4.0 59.2% 68.8% 48.1% 51.1% 45.7% 60.2% 38.1% 2015 14/14 7.6 2.4 60.6% 66.1% 48.3% 52.4% 18.2% 59.5% 28.3%
28 2015 55/55 3.4 3.6 58.4% 69.0% 49.3% 57.5% 40.8% 60.8% 39.2% 2016 11/11 5.7 3.3 56.9% 69.7% 49.9% 52.4% 53.8% 60.8% 31.2%
29 2016 44/47 3.4 4.4 56.0% 69.1% 51.4% 52.7% 42.7% 61.1% 39.6% 2017 17/17 7.2 2.2 57.4% 74.0% 56.2% 58.3% 35.3% 65.9% 33.4%
30 2017 58/58 3.3 4.7 58.8% 69.1% 49.8% 57.4% 42.8% 61.2% 38.8% 2018 27/27 8.0 3.1 57.1% 74.5% 51.2% 48.5% 37.5% 64.4% 34.5%
31 2018 64/66 3.8 3.5 61.8% 68.9% 52.7% 55.6% 48.5% 62.7% 40.5% 2019 4/4 5.3 2.3 61.2% 71.4% 49.5% 68.5% 8.3% 62.5% 28.2%
32 2019 51/52 3.9 3.7 60.7% 67.9% 49.0% 53.2% 42.9% 60.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 12/12 5.3 4.2 54.5% 67.7% 51.4% 46.1% 48.4% 60.1% 34.7% 2021 2/2 4.0 1.5 62.4% 71.8% 63.0% 62.5% 16.7% 68.7% 32.3%
34 2021 39/42 3.0 4.3 60.1% 68.4% 48.4% 54.2% 44.8% 60.5% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 42/43 3.3 4.5 59.3% 65.9% 49.0% 57.2% 40.1% 58.9% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 22/22 2.9 4.7 60.4% 65.4% 46.8% 49.6% 43.0% 58.1% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 26/26 4.4 4.8 57.8% 67.4% 45.6% 49.9% 43.4% 58.0% 34.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 7/7 0.7 5.4 51.9% 62.0% 49.9% 43.4% 24.9% 56.1% 31.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 775/787 3.3 4.0 59.0% 67.3% 48.4% 53.5% 44.2% 59.5% 38.6% — 215/216 6.4 2.6 58.5% 70.7% 50.3% 53.0% 38.2% 62.2% 33.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Fabio Fognini Lukas Lacko
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2005 1482 99.2 +0.23 -1.18 0.887 47.5% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.22 2006 1483 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 1477 110.3 -2.63 +0.34 0.866 47.3% — +31 — 35.3% -1.00 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.26 2007 1499 101.9 +1.81 -2.71 0.502 39.5% — — — 16.7% -2.67 — — — +0.02
20 2007 1602 117.2 -2.15 -0.69 0.814 46.3% -46 +18 — 44.8% -0.69 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.25 2008 1480 94.2 -0.69 -1.07 0.779 46.8% — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.29
21 2008 1615 127.2 -3.14 +0.45 0.925 48.6% -103 +155 — 43.4% -0.61 6–5 (55%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.15 2009 1607 112.9 -1.36 -0.52 0.671 46.0% — — +49 30.0% -0.80 0–1 2–2 (50%) — -0.10
22 2009 1716 132.0 -5.36 +0.55 0.866 47.2% -159 +131 -181 37.4% -1.01 7–7 (50%) 9–6 (60%) — -0.90 2010 1670 135.5 +0.10 -0.24 0.982 49.4% -21 -170 -17 45.5% -0.57 6–12 (33%) 15–6 (71%) — -0.83
23 2010 1704 131.6 -5.15 +1.23 0.875 47.4% -88 +13 -98 37.7% -0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.82 2011 1670 132.6 -1.32 -1.02 0.806 46.9% +1 — — 37.5% -0.75 3–3 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.54
24 2011 1728 142.9 -3.68 +1.72 0.937 48.9% -115 +73 — 48.0% -0.26 8–12 (40%) 8–5 (62%) — +0.45 2012 1644 139.6 -1.32 -1.68 0.874 47.5% +20 -213 +119 38.6% -0.76 6–3 (67%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.47
25 2012 1764 140.0 -3.89 +1.02 0.912 48.4% -75 +8 -38 46.2% -0.38 8–5 (62%) 10–5 (67%) — +0.35 2013 1668 139.8 -2.67 -1.18 0.882 47.9% +30 — — 45.6% -0.69 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — -0.64
26 2013 1933 165.8 -1.81 +4.34 1.027 50.6% -168 +182 -226 58.3% +0.36 13–11 (54%) 13–9 (59%) — -0.89 2014 1734 137.9 -0.40 -1.90 0.904 48.4% +3 — -21 39.4% -0.62 2–3 (40%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.19
27 2014 1824 155.2 -2.34 +1.83 0.959 49.1% -21 +165 -68 56.4% +0.07 14–5 (74%) 11–4 (73%) — +2.30 2015 1648 120.8 -3.25 -3.69 0.699 44.0% -38 — +63 26.2% -1.62 2–4 (33%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.16
28 2015 1908 159.9 -1.81 +2.86 1.001 50.0% -62 +90 — 51.4% +0.05 12–5 (71%) 9–11 (45%) — +0.93 2016 1682 124.0 -2.47 -1.63 0.798 46.8% -124 — +133 38.5% -0.69 1–0 2–3 (40%) — +0.21
29 2016 1871 155.5 -1.25 +2.39 1.019 50.5% -16 +34 — 52.5% +0.19 10–9 (53%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.07 2017 1740 131.9 +1.11 -2.04 0.978 49.7% -14 — +51 40.5% -0.36 1–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.17
30 2017 1946 159.9 -1.21 +2.19 1.002 50.1% -11 -23 -165 56.7% +0.10 14–7 (67%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.17 2018 1678 127.0 -0.16 -1.20 0.969 49.4% -91 — +171 43.3% -0.25 3–4 (43%) 4–6 (40%) — +1.00
31 2018 1944 156.4 -0.63 +3.84 1.087 51.6% -12 +56 -127 60.8% +0.58 16–8 (67%) 7–8 (47%) — +2.85 2019 1579 109.6 -3.16 -1.14 0.753 46.3% -3 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — +0.11
32 2019 1908 157.6 -2.55 +2.86 0.977 49.6% -19 +81 -89 53.8% +0.05 9–5 (64%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.99 2020 1514 93.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2020 1799 125.0 -2.89 -0.42 0.870 47.4% +50 +60 — 39.5% -0.53 3–2 (60%) 5–4 (56%) — +0.27 2021 1497 101.4 +0.23 -1.99 1.032 50.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 0–2 — +0.09
34 2021 1773 149.5 -1.39 +0.94 0.972 49.6% +28 +52 +62 52.7% -0.02 4–9 (31%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.27 2022 1445 93.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1703 141.0 -3.90 +0.04 0.885 48.0% +22 +76 — 45.5% -0.40 9–4 (69%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1692 133.5 -4.24 +2.71 0.941 48.7% -31 +89 — 47.4% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 8–1 (89%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1679 121.5 -3.83 -1.47 0.833 46.6% -78 +120 +144 44.9% -0.45 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2025 1579 103.9 -1.49 -2.36 0.717 43.9% — +125 +163 21.1% -2.10 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2033 153.0 -2.64 +1.84 0.954 49.2% -46 +84 -49 50.2% -0.15 151–117 (56%) 154–119 (56%) 109.2 +0.90 — 1838 133.0 -0.96 -1.44 0.886 48.0% -14 -189 +77 39.8% -0.70 28–36 (44%) 46–49 (48%) 97.9 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.