H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Fabio Fognini vs Milos Raonic H2H: 0-1
Milos Raonic holds a 1–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Milos Raonic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2014 Cincinnati Masters quarterfinal 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2014* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-1 6-0 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabio Fognini | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |