H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Fabio Fognini vs Philipp Petzschner H2H: 0-1
Philipp Petzschner holds a 1–0 lead over Fabio Fognini in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Philipp Petzschner leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Philipp Petzschner won the 2010 Madrid Masters second round 6-1 4-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2010* | Madrid Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Philipp Petzschner | 6-1 4-6 7-5 | Fabio Fognini | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabio Fognini | #188 | #9 | 2,920 | 2,033 | 398 | 382 | 51.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 85 | 104 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Fabio Fognini | Philipp Petzschner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #305 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #247 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #95 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #88 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #54 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2010 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #55 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #48 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,763 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 41–26 | 61.2% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 36–24 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2015 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #21 | 1,908 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #49 | 1,864 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #27 | 1,945 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2018 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,949 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2019 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #12 | 1,911 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #17 | 1,800 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #37 | 1,766 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2022 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #55 | 1,700 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2023 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,690 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2024 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #91 | 1,675 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2025 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,577 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |