H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Facundo Bagnis vs Alexandr Dolgopolov H2H: 0-1
Alexandr Dolgopolov holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexandr Dolgopolov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Alexandr Dolgopolov won the 2014 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2014* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 500 | R16 | Clay | Alexandr Dolgopolov | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4) | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alexandr Dolgopolov | #508 | #13 | 2,030 | 2,020 | 215 | 200 | 51.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Alexandr Dolgopolov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #48 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 38–29 | 56.7% | #15 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #36 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #62 | 1,773 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,905 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #260 | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |