H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Facundo Bagnis vs Marius Copil

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Facundo Bagnis vs Marius Copil.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Facundo Bagnis
Argentina Age 36 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Marius Copil
ROU Age 35 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marius Copil #238 6-4 3-6 7-5 Facundo Bagnis #171 Match data Aug 29, 2011 Q1 Q US Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Facundo Bagnis #500 #55 985 1,759 45 88 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Marius Copil #1,021 #56 888 1,810 47 81 36.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Facundo Bagnis Marius Copil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 2009 1–1 50.0% #467 1,444 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #291 1,465 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2011 1–2 33.3% #217 1,553 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #157 1,499 0 0 2012 3–3 50.0% #160 1,641 0 0
22 2012 1–2 33.3% #237 1,517 0 0 2013 1–5 16.7% #147 1,612 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2014 6–6 50.0% #172 1,696 0 0
24 2014 2–3 40.0% #125 1,607 0 0 2015 3–5 37.5% #165 1,677 0 0
25 2015 2–4 33.3% #140 1,562 0 0 2016 3–4 42.9% #132 1,737 0 0
26 2016 6–11 35.3% #56 1,640 0 0 2017 7–14 33.3% #93 1,674 0 0
27 2017 3–12 20.0% #181 1,593 0 0 2018 15–20 42.9% #60 1,808 0 0
28 2018 2–4 33.3% #153 1,633 0 0 2019 7–19 26.9% #153 1,706 0 0
29 2019 2–5 28.6% #137 1,629 0 0 — — — — — — —
30 2020 1–4 20.0% #125 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2021 11–12 47.8% #76 1,668 0 0 2022 0–1 0.0% #374 1,569 0 0
32 2022 7–15 31.8% #89 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 2–9 18.2% #242 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2024 5–3 62.5% #144 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2025 1–2 33.3% #398 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Facundo Bagnis Marius Copil
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 2011 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2012 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2012 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2017 5 8 13 38.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2018 12 12 24 50.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2019 7 15 22 31.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2019 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2022 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2022 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1 2 3 33.3% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 22 30 26.7% 37 61 98 37.8% 0 5 5 0.0% — 34 48 82 41.5% 7 24 31 22.6% 6 9 15 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 132/133 of Facundo Bagnis's and 128/128 of Marius Copil's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Facundo Bagnis Marius Copil
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 2/2 7.0 4.5 48.8% 77.1% 50.6% 64.3% 41.1% 63.5% 42.4%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 3.0 50.0% 65.1% 39.5% 69.2% 75.0% 52.3% 37.1%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 3/3 7.3 1.7 57.7% 72.6% 48.2% 39.3% 17.4% 62.7% 35.0%
21 2011 2/2 2.0 7.0 48.1% 68.3% 47.2% 47.9% 30.0% 57.2% 34.7% 2012 6/6 10.8 1.8 61.8% 77.3% 52.3% 71.7% 37.0% 67.6% 35.5%
22 2012 3/3 4.0 2.0 64.7% 69.3% 51.5% 54.5% 22.9% 63.0% 33.4% 2013 6/6 9.0 3.3 56.8% 71.1% 49.4% 60.6% 21.7% 61.7% 28.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 12/12 10.5 2.0 61.0% 74.0% 52.1% 73.0% 20.2% 64.9% 31.6%
24 2014 5/5 5.8 5.0 61.3% 68.0% 46.6% 55.7% 37.6% 59.5% 30.9% 2015 8/8 12.6 3.1 55.1% 75.8% 53.4% 65.9% 41.6% 65.9% 32.6%
25 2015 6/6 3.3 2.7 59.7% 60.4% 49.9% 54.0% 38.5% 55.8% 33.6% 2016 7/7 9.6 3.4 58.2% 73.3% 55.7% 43.4% 62.7% 65.6% 36.0%
26 2016 17/17 3.1 4.2 59.5% 66.0% 48.1% 51.3% 39.0% 58.1% 36.2% 2017 21/21 10.0 3.5 56.1% 76.0% 51.6% 57.5% 35.5% 65.2% 31.5%
27 2017 15/15 5.9 4.3 61.7% 68.1% 45.2% 54.6% 34.5% 59.3% 32.0% 2018 35/35 12.8 3.3 58.9% 77.6% 55.1% 60.6% 37.3% 68.0% 32.3%
28 2018 6/6 5.2 4.0 63.8% 70.7% 55.0% 56.1% 27.1% 64.8% 34.3% 2019 26/26 11.3 3.4 57.2% 73.3% 48.8% 56.4% 35.6% 62.9% 30.3%
29 2019 7/7 3.0 2.1 59.1% 62.4% 51.3% 54.4% 37.8% 58.0% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 5/5 4.8 2.4 60.4% 64.5% 55.4% 39.8% 26.2% 60.7% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 22/23 5.5 2.9 60.5% 69.6% 49.5% 63.3% 43.3% 61.8% 38.4% 2022 1/1 11.0 2.0 62.8% 76.3% 57.1% 50.0% 0.0% 69.1% 26.3%
32 2022 22/22 5.5 2.3 62.4% 66.9% 50.7% 57.5% 41.8% 60.8% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 11/11 6.1 2.7 66.3% 61.8% 47.4% 54.7% 35.9% 57.1% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 8/8 3.8 1.9 64.3% 67.7% 51.7% 70.7% 45.4% 62.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 3/3 6.0 1.3 63.7% 68.7% 54.3% 62.7% 43.7% 63.7% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 132/133 4.8 3.1 61.6% 66.7% 49.6% 56.7% 38.2% 60.0% 35.5% — 128/128 11.1 3.1 57.8% 75.2% 52.2% 59.8% 35.6% 65.3% 32.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Facundo Bagnis Marius Copil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1483 96.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1460 99.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1444 105.1 -0.74 -2.41 1.162 53.2% — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 1–0 — +0.17
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1466 107.9 -1.19 -1.58 0.779 45.5% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.14
20 2010 1501 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1554 115.1 +0.38 -3.10 0.938 47.4% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
21 2011 1500 108.9 -0.66 -2.78 0.812 45.4% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.03 2012 1641 121.6 +2.57 -0.78 1.093 51.3% -2 — — 50.0% +0.07 1–1 1–1 — -0.32
22 2012 1517 112.0 -0.08 +1.00 0.903 47.6% — +102 — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.29 2013 1613 118.9 -0.92 -2.99 0.739 45.9% — — — 21.4% -1.43 1–1 0–1 — -0.16
23 2013 1488 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1696 129.0 +0.87 -2.43 0.901 48.2% +34 -125 — 48.1% -0.26 2–1 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.33
24 2014 1607 119.1 -0.79 -0.08 0.764 46.3% — +17 — 35.3% -1.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.10 2015 1678 122.4 +0.84 -1.99 0.956 49.4% +42 — -45 42.9% -0.19 1–2 (33%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.66
25 2015 1562 109.1 -3.38 -3.19 0.760 44.7% — +64 — 30.8% -1.38 2–0 0–1 — +0.67 2016 1737 124.6 +1.66 -1.66 1.047 50.6% +26 — — 50.0% -0.35 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — -0.30
26 2016 1641 128.1 -3.12 -0.39 0.865 47.4% — +74 — 36.1% -0.72 1–0 2–5 (29%) — -0.10 2017 1674 138.4 +1.25 -2.84 0.905 48.3% +64 -66 — 37.0% -0.76 3–4 (43%) 8–8 (50%) — +0.06
27 2017 1594 127.3 -2.62 -2.67 0.788 46.0% -62 +97 — 28.2% -1.28 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.29 2018 1809 146.2 +2.98 -2.62 1.009 50.1% +33 -205 -181 48.2% -0.07 3–9 (25%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.13
28 2018 1633 121.6 -0.02 -0.66 0.976 48.8% — +66 — 41.2% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.46 2019 1706 138.7 -0.25 -4.35 0.816 47.1% +48 -145 — 35.1% -1.07 5–7 (42%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.18
29 2019 1630 113.6 -2.00 -2.78 0.765 45.8% — +102 — 26.7% -1.53 1–0 0–1 — +0.21 2020 1665 94.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2020 1673 120.0 +0.34 +0.61 0.957 48.7% — +68 — 33.3% -0.75 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.21 2021 1582 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2021 1669 126.0 -0.76 -0.06 1.007 50.4% -130 +123 — 50.0% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.28 2022 1570 106.2 -3.65 +1.03 0.851 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.07
32 2022 1644 132.9 -1.83 -0.30 0.974 49.6% -47 +59 — 38.9% -0.48 1–4 (20%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1637 121.0 -3.92 -3.01 0.719 44.9% -49 +88 — 26.9% -1.31 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) — -0.05 2024 1557 97.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1649 125.9 +0.16 +0.66 1.030 50.7% — +120 — 64.7% +0.41 0–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1602 108.5 -1.57 +0.51 1.028 50.3% — — — 44.4% -0.11 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1760 127.1 -1.77 -0.93 0.889 48.0% -71 +87 — 38.2% -0.70 16–22 (42%) 19–39 (33%) 92.6 +1.62 — 1811 134.7 +1.23 -2.80 0.926 48.8% +41 -127 -136 41.5% -0.53 17–30 (36%) 39–34 (53%) 101.1 -2.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.