H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Facundo Bagnis vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 0-1
Mischa Zverev holds a 1–0 lead over Facundo Bagnis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2016 Kitzbuhel third round 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2016* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mischa Zverev | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Facundo Bagnis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |