H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Facundo Bagnis vs Pedro Sousa
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Facundo Bagnis vs Pedro Sousa.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
POR
Age 38
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pedro Sousa | #1,188 | #99 | 726 | 1,567 | 9 | 27 | 25.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Pedro Sousa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1479 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #126 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #140 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #105 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #173 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #497 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |