H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Facundo Bagnis vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Facundo Bagnis vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 36
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facundo Bagnis | #431 | #55 | 985 | 1,760 | 45 | 87 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Facundo Bagnis | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2014 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #125 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2015 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #140 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2016 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #56 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2017 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #181 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2018 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #153 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2019 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #125 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2021 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2022 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #89 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2023 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #242 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2024 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #144 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | 2025 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #398 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |