H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Facundo Bagnis vs Thiemo de Bakker

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Facundo Bagnis vs Thiemo de Bakker.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Facundo Bagnis
Argentina Age 36 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main draw meetings
Thiemo de Bakker
NED Age 37 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Thiemo de Bakker #142 6-1 6-4 Facundo Bagnis #117 Match data Feb 10, 2015* Q3 Q Sao Paulo ATP 250 Clay

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Facundo Bagnis #500 #55 985 1,759 45 88 33.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Thiemo de Bakker #1,382 #40 1,010 1,853 54 80 40.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Facundo Bagnis Thiemo de Bakker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 1–1 50.0% #464 1,512 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 1–4 20.0% #444 1,502 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #249 1,531 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 2009 2–3 40.0% #96 1,612 0 0
21 2011 0–2 0.0% #157 1,499 0 0 2010 26–23 53.1% #43 1,763 0 0
22 2012 1–2 33.3% #237 1,517 0 0 2011 2–11 15.4% #223 1,665 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2012 0–2 0.0% #124 1,642 0 0
24 2014 2–3 40.0% #125 1,607 0 0 2013 7–10 41.2% #146 1,683 0 0
25 2015 2–4 33.3% #140 1,562 0 0 2014 7–6 53.8% #144 1,665 0 0
26 2016 6–11 35.3% #56 1,640 0 0 2015 2–5 28.6% #99 1,617 0 0
27 2017 3–12 20.0% #181 1,593 0 0 2016 5–12 29.4% #257 1,582 0 0
28 2018 2–4 33.3% #153 1,633 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 2019 2–5 28.6% #137 1,629 0 0 2018 0–1 0.0% #242 1,558 0 0
30 2020 1–4 20.0% #125 1,673 0 0 2019 0–1 0.0% #511 1,536 0 0
31 2021 11–12 47.8% #76 1,668 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2022 7–15 31.8% #89 1,643 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2023 2–9 18.2% #242 1,636 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2024 5–3 62.5% #144 1,648 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2025 1–2 33.3% #398 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Facundo Bagnis Thiemo de Bakker
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2011 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
22 2012 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 1 6 7 14.3% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2015 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
27 2017 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
28 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2020 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 2019 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 3 7 10 30.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1 2 3 33.3% 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 8 22 30 26.7% 37 61 98 37.8% 0 5 5 0.0% — 27 45 72 37.5% 20 24 44 45.5% 7 11 18 38.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 132/133 of Facundo Bagnis's and 133/134 of Thiemo de Bakker's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Facundo Bagnis Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 2/2 3.5 3.0 54.6% 74.1% 49.1% 72.9% 41.7% 62.8% 39.2%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 5/5 8.2 1.2 65.7% 71.8% 58.9% 57.1% 49.6% 67.3% 25.6%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 7.5 1.0 55.0% 73.1% 56.3% 68.6% 31.3% 66.0% 34.0%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 5/5 5.8 1.4 62.2% 70.1% 51.0% 61.2% 36.1% 62.1% 36.0%
21 2011 2/2 2.0 7.0 48.1% 68.3% 47.2% 47.9% 30.0% 57.2% 34.7% 2010 49/49 9.8 1.6 61.0% 73.7% 53.5% 60.8% 41.7% 65.8% 35.9%
22 2012 3/3 4.0 2.0 64.7% 69.3% 51.5% 54.5% 22.9% 63.0% 33.4% 2011 13/13 6.5 2.8 54.5% 68.0% 48.7% 53.9% 21.4% 59.2% 28.0%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 2/2 5.0 1.0 55.3% 60.2% 42.0% 48.5% 100.0% 52.1% 28.9%
24 2014 5/5 5.8 5.0 61.3% 68.0% 46.6% 55.7% 37.6% 59.5% 30.9% 2013 17/17 6.2 2.0 60.6% 69.6% 45.6% 62.0% 41.5% 60.2% 34.7%
25 2015 6/6 3.3 2.7 59.7% 60.4% 49.9% 54.0% 38.5% 55.8% 33.6% 2014 12/13 8.7 2.2 57.1% 77.0% 47.1% 64.2% 26.3% 64.1% 33.6%
26 2016 17/17 3.1 4.2 59.5% 66.0% 48.1% 51.3% 39.0% 58.1% 36.2% 2015 7/7 9.0 2.0 54.3% 74.6% 49.2% 59.1% 37.8% 63.0% 34.9%
27 2017 15/15 5.9 4.3 61.7% 68.1% 45.2% 54.6% 34.5% 59.3% 32.0% 2016 17/17 7.2 1.5 60.3% 70.5% 47.1% 49.0% 36.1% 61.3% 33.8%
28 2018 6/6 5.2 4.0 63.8% 70.7% 55.0% 56.1% 27.1% 64.8% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 7/7 3.0 2.1 59.1% 62.4% 51.3% 54.4% 37.8% 58.0% 32.1% 2018 1/1 4.0 3.0 71.7% 60.6% 15.4% 33.3% — 47.8% 15.8%
30 2020 5/5 4.8 2.4 60.4% 64.5% 55.4% 39.8% 26.2% 60.7% 37.6% 2019 1/1 9.0 4.0 58.2% 68.8% 17.4% 69.2% — 47.3% 21.4%
31 2021 22/23 5.5 2.9 60.5% 69.6% 49.5% 63.3% 43.3% 61.8% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 22/22 5.5 2.3 62.4% 66.9% 50.7% 57.5% 41.8% 60.8% 38.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 11/11 6.1 2.7 66.3% 61.8% 47.4% 54.7% 35.9% 57.1% 30.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 8/8 3.8 1.9 64.3% 67.7% 51.7% 70.7% 45.4% 62.0% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 3/3 6.0 1.3 63.7% 68.7% 54.3% 62.7% 43.7% 63.7% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 132/133 4.8 3.1 61.6% 66.7% 49.6% 56.7% 38.2% 60.0% 35.5% — 133/134 8.1 1.8 59.5% 72.0% 49.7% 58.8% 37.6% 63.0% 33.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Facundo Bagnis Thiemo de Bakker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1513 104.7 -0.21 +0.15 1.055 51.5% — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — -0.08
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1502 115.2 -0.81 -3.06 0.782 47.1% — — — 35.7% -0.79 0–2 4–3 (57%) — -0.08
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1532 107.0 -0.17 -0.92 1.000 50.8% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
20 2010 1501 102.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1612 119.7 +1.05 -2.08 0.949 49.0% — — — 41.7% -0.58 1–1 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
21 2011 1500 108.9 -0.66 -2.78 0.812 45.4% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.03 2010 1764 149.9 +1.79 +0.33 1.050 50.7% -70 +14 -122 50.8% +0.25 7–5 (58%) 11–16 (41%) — +0.27
22 2012 1517 112.0 -0.08 +1.00 0.903 47.6% — +102 — 28.6% -1.00 1–0 — — -0.29 2011 1665 125.5 -1.60 -4.74 0.686 44.4% -43 +82 — 27.0% -1.97 2–4 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.54
23 2013 1488 108.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1642 103.3 -3.01 -3.23 0.604 41.7% — — — 0.0% -3.25 — 0–1 — -0.03
24 2014 1607 119.1 -0.79 -0.08 0.764 46.3% — +17 — 35.3% -1.12 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.10 2013 1684 129.6 -1.39 -1.41 0.871 47.6% -45 +78 -77 37.8% -0.81 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.74
25 2015 1562 109.1 -3.38 -3.19 0.760 44.7% — +64 — 30.8% -1.38 2–0 0–1 — +0.67 2014 1665 127.0 +0.17 -1.17 0.935 48.9% +12 — — 48.1% -0.19 2–1 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.61
26 2016 1641 128.1 -3.12 -0.39 0.865 47.4% — +74 — 36.1% -0.72 1–0 2–5 (29%) — -0.10 2015 1618 116.8 +1.14 -1.79 0.944 49.0% — +111 — 41.2% -0.17 2–3 (40%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.19
27 2017 1594 127.3 -2.62 -2.67 0.788 46.0% -62 +97 — 28.2% -1.28 2–4 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.29 2016 1583 124.7 -1.66 -1.23 0.874 47.5% +82 +70 — 34.9% -1.05 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.71
28 2018 1633 121.6 -0.02 -0.66 0.976 48.8% — +66 — 41.2% -0.76 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) — +0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2019 1630 113.6 -2.00 -2.78 0.765 45.8% — +102 — 26.7% -1.53 1–0 0–1 — +0.21 2018 1558 101.5 -1.76 -3.04 0.303 33.3% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.06
30 2020 1673 120.0 +0.34 +0.61 0.957 48.7% — +68 — 33.3% -0.75 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.21 2019 1536 99.8 +0.16 -1.51 0.406 36.1% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.04
31 2021 1669 126.0 -0.76 -0.06 1.007 50.4% -130 +123 — 50.0% -0.02 2–3 (40%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2022 1644 132.9 -1.83 -0.30 0.974 49.6% -47 +59 — 38.9% -0.48 1–4 (20%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2023 1637 121.0 -3.92 -3.01 0.719 44.9% -49 +88 — 26.9% -1.31 2–2 (50%) 0–5 (0%) — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2024 1649 125.9 +0.16 +0.66 1.030 50.7% — +120 — 64.7% +0.41 0–1 3–2 (60%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2025 1602 108.5 -1.57 +0.51 1.028 50.3% — — — 44.4% -0.11 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1760 127.1 -1.77 -0.93 0.889 48.0% -71 +87 — 38.2% -0.70 16–22 (42%) 19–39 (33%) 92.6 +1.62 — 1854 134.5 +0.13 -1.17 0.910 48.5% -29 +62 -104 41.6% -0.54 18–21 (46%) 33–36 (48%) 101.5 -0.74

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.