H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Federico Coria vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 3-0
Federico Coria holds a 3–0 lead over Pablo Cuevas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Federico Coria leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Federico Coria won the 2022 Indian Wells Masters first round 6-4 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 34
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2022* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Federico Coria | 6-4 7-6(5) | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| Feb 10, 2022* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Federico Coria | 6-1 1-6 6-3 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
| May 28, 2021* | Belgrade 2 | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Federico Coria | 6-3 6-2 | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico Coria | #378 | #49 | 1,063 | 1,716 | 54 | 76 | 41.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federico Coria | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #279 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2021 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #63 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2022 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #75 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2023 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #88 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2024 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #100 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2025 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |