H2H data updated: 2026-09-08 00:00 UTC

Federico Delbonis vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Federico Delbonis vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Federico Delbonis
ARG Age 35 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 0
0 main-draw meetings
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
ESP Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #94 6-4 6-4 Federico Delbonis #176 Match data Oct 24, 2011 Q1 Q Vienna Open ATP 250 Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Federico Delbonis #939 #33 1,435 1,898 158 196 44.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Daniel Gimeno-Traver #1,222 #48 998 1,809 95 169 36.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Federico Delbonis Daniel Gimeno-Traver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2009 0–1 0.0% #195 1,530 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #180 1,481 0 0
19 2010 0–2 0.0% #160 1,455 0 0 2005 0–1 0.0% #192 1,503 0 0
20 2011 3–2 60.0% #166 1,551 0 0 2006 2–4 33.3% #267 1,505 0 0
21 2012 6–9 40.0% #133 1,715 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2013 12–8 60.0% #55 1,748 0 0 2008 7–7 50.0% #90 1,631 0 0
23 2014 20–27 42.6% #60 1,659 0 1 2009 9–20 31.0% #72 1,641 0 0
24 2015 15–18 45.5% #52 1,693 0 1 2010 17–23 42.5% #56 1,733 0 0
25 2016 24–23 51.1% #41 1,752 0 2 2011 8–23 25.8% #107 1,644 0 0
26 2017 11–10 52.4% #68 1,810 0 2 2012 6–12 33.3% #70 1,620 0 0
27 2018 11–18 37.9% #80 1,722 0 2 2013 14–27 34.1% #77 1,576 0 0
28 2019 14–20 41.2% #76 1,686 0 2 2014 11–20 35.5% #112 1,627 0 0
29 2020 9–12 42.9% #82 1,705 0 2 2015 13–18 41.9% #98 1,611 0 0
30 2021 24–24 50.0% #44 1,715 0 2 2016 8–10 44.4% #115 1,686 0 0
31 2022 8–21 27.6% #125 1,671 0 2 2017 0–1 0.0% #366 1,632 0 0
32 2023 1–1 50.0% #279 1,598 0 2 2018 0–1 0.0% #189 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Federico Delbonis Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2011 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
21 2012 0 1 1 0.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 2 2 4 50.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — —
23 2014 2 12 14 14.3% 18 13 31 58.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 2009 0 4 4 0.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 2015 3 8 11 27.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 6 10 16 37.5% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2016 10 14 24 41.7% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 7 7 0.0% 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2017 4 3 7 57.1% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 2012 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
27 2018 1 4 5 20.0% 10 12 22 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2013 4 10 14 28.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
28 2019 2 6 8 25.0% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2014 2 7 9 22.2% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2020 1 5 6 16.7% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 2015 2 5 7 28.6% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 2021 0 10 10 0.0% 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2016 0 2 2 0.0% 8 8 16 50.0% — — — —
31 2022 0 5 5 0.0% 8 14 22 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2023 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 25 71 96 26.0% 133 113 246 54.1% 0 12 12 0.0% — 17 50 67 25.4% 76 102 178 42.7% 2 17 19 10.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 352/354 of Federico Delbonis's and 264/264 of Daniel Gimeno-Traver's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Federico Delbonis Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2009 1/1 2.0 1.0 59.7% 62.5% 48.1% 28.6% 33.3% 56.7% 39.0% 2004 2/2 5.5 6.0 54.4% 62.4% 53.3% 68.8% 100.0% 58.1% 21.2%
19 2010 2/2 5.5 4.0 51.0% 65.3% 51.2% 42.5% 100.0% 58.0% 30.6% 2005 1/1 3.0 5.0 67.2% 56.1% 42.5% 52.6% 44.4% 51.6% 39.2%
20 2011 5/5 2.6 2.6 55.3% 72.4% 57.3% 71.3% 49.8% 65.7% 42.1% 2006 6/6 3.3 1.8 57.2% 67.3% 41.5% 52.7% 33.1% 56.4% 33.5%
21 2012 15/15 2.6 2.7 62.6% 71.7% 50.7% 57.0% 45.9% 63.6% 38.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 20/20 3.3 3.0 60.5% 71.8% 53.1% 65.2% 39.5% 64.6% 36.0% 2008 14/14 4.1 1.7 62.5% 72.5% 58.4% 60.7% 45.1% 66.9% 38.4%
23 2014 47/47 4.1 2.6 62.4% 71.1% 53.2% 58.2% 37.9% 64.5% 36.0% 2009 29/29 3.2 2.9 64.0% 68.1% 45.1% 50.7% 37.3% 59.6% 34.4%
24 2015 33/33 3.3 3.8 59.1% 68.0% 49.7% 53.1% 40.0% 60.5% 37.1% 2010 40/40 5.8 3.0 58.7% 72.0% 52.8% 62.4% 30.9% 63.9% 33.4%
25 2016 46/47 5.0 3.8 57.7% 72.7% 53.6% 54.7% 42.5% 64.7% 37.9% 2011 31/31 4.6 2.9 56.0% 68.5% 46.3% 45.7% 36.1% 58.7% 35.7%
26 2017 21/21 2.9 3.1 62.0% 69.3% 53.0% 58.4% 38.9% 63.1% 36.6% 2012 18/18 5.3 2.6 57.3% 68.6% 49.9% 53.6% 32.0% 60.5% 35.2%
27 2018 29/29 3.3 3.8 60.7% 68.1% 50.9% 59.1% 37.8% 61.4% 37.2% 2013 41/41 5.6 3.7 56.3% 71.1% 48.1% 58.1% 38.3% 60.9% 36.1%
28 2019 34/34 3.5 4.4 61.8% 67.3% 49.9% 55.2% 45.3% 60.6% 37.1% 2014 31/31 4.5 2.3 56.5% 69.9% 50.0% 51.7% 45.8% 61.3% 36.1%
29 2020 21/21 3.9 4.1 62.0% 69.7% 47.0% 59.5% 31.9% 60.8% 36.3% 2015 31/31 3.5 2.7 60.7% 70.2% 49.1% 50.0% 33.9% 61.7% 36.5%
30 2021 47/48 3.0 3.3 62.9% 67.9% 48.5% 58.5% 39.7% 60.8% 38.9% 2016 18/18 3.3 4.2 56.9% 67.3% 44.8% 53.3% 43.9% 57.6% 36.0%
31 2022 29/29 3.2 3.3 65.7% 65.9% 46.5% 52.3% 52.0% 59.2% 33.8% 2017 1/1 1.0 2.0 81.3% 53.8% 33.3% 50.0% — 50.0% 20.0%
32 2023 2/2 2.0 5.0 60.7% 63.1% 57.1% 66.7% 49.4% 61.2% 40.5% 2018 1/1 1.0 9.0 68.3% 61.0% 5.3% 53.8% 66.7% 43.3% 39.1%
Career — 352/354 3.6 3.4 61.3% 69.3% 50.8% 57.1% 41.5% 62.2% 37.0% — 264/264 4.5 3.0 58.7% 69.7% 48.7% 54.2% 37.8% 60.9% 35.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Federico Delbonis Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2009 1531 104.9 +1.54 +1.69 0.900 47.2% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.22 2004 1482 101.5 +0.02 -4.18 0.507 41.9% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.14
19 2010 1455 98.1 -1.64 -4.62 0.728 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.17 2005 1504 103.3 -2.38 -5.10 0.811 45.3% — — — 25.0% -2.50 — 1–0 — +0.30
20 2011 1551 118.9 +1.25 +1.71 1.229 53.8% — +96 — 63.6% +1.55 0–1 0–1 — +0.12 2006 1505 106.3 -1.22 -1.03 0.768 45.4% — +18 — 28.6% -1.21 2–0 0–2 — -0.11
21 2012 1716 134.1 +0.78 +0.82 1.066 51.0% — +108 — 42.4% +0.06 1–2 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 95.6 0.00 2007 1519 102.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2013 1748 139.4 +1.43 -0.37 1.017 50.3% -261 +198 — 56.3% +0.02 3–1 (75%) 9–4 (69%) 107.0 -0.16 2008 1631 128.1 +1.40 -0.10 1.161 52.0% — +43 — 51.5% +0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.20
23 2014 1659 139.9 +0.59 -0.67 1.015 50.1% -187 +188 — 43.9% -0.21 6–8 (43%) 6–14 (30%) 92.5 +0.52 2009 1642 132.0 -1.77 -1.98 0.851 47.2% -138 +74 -75 27.9% -1.10 4–3 (57%) 4–6 (40%) 101.0 -1.24
24 2015 1694 141.9 -2.55 +0.99 0.939 48.9% -227 +164 — 44.4% -0.62 5–8 (38%) 8–4 (67%) 102.2 -1.35 2010 1733 140.5 +0.99 -2.01 0.927 48.4% -136 +88 — 43.3% -0.43 6–7 (46%) 7–11 (39%) 101.8 -1.95
25 2016 1752 151.4 +0.81 +1.24 1.074 51.0% -113 +125 — 50.8% +0.09 8–11 (42%) 14–13 (52%) 101.9 +0.29 2011 1644 128.2 -2.58 -1.56 0.865 47.0% -119 +119 -118 28.4% -1.45 3–7 (30%) 4–7 (36%) 95.4 -0.72
26 2017 1810 146.8 -0.28 -0.65 0.992 49.8% -88 +44 — 48.9% -0.02 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 104.7 -0.11 2012 1621 127.1 -1.49 -2.10 0.892 48.0% -62 +56 — 34.1% -0.95 2–3 (40%) 3–4 (43%) 100.0 +0.11
27 2018 1722 141.7 -1.88 +0.36 0.963 49.3% -54 +64 — 39.7% -0.44 3–7 (30%) 6–9 (40%) 92.3 -1.63 2013 1576 139.2 -1.50 -0.77 0.924 48.5% -58 +152 -118 41.1% -0.62 5–12 (29%) 7–11 (39%) 95.0 +0.22
28 2019 1687 143.1 -2.47 +0.35 0.941 48.8% -62 +160 — 42.7% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 6–15 (29%) 94.2 +0.44 2014 1628 138.6 -1.23 +0.16 0.933 48.7% -95 +102 -208 39.5% -0.54 2–7 (22%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 -0.44
29 2020 1706 134.9 -1.28 -1.40 0.926 48.8% -73 +115 — 45.3% -0.43 2–4 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 -0.54 2015 1612 125.5 -1.66 -0.02 0.954 49.0% -140 +126 -207 40.5% -0.59 5–4 (56%) 6–9 (40%) 101.8 +0.04
30 2021 1716 141.7 -1.58 +1.20 0.991 49.7% -195 +201 — 47.1% -0.02 10–5 (67%) 7–12 (37%) 100.2 +1.51 2016 1686 121.3 -3.34 -1.10 0.850 47.5% — +96 — 40.5% -1.00 4–4 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 100.6 +1.22
31 2022 1671 132.0 -3.23 -1.65 0.828 47.0% -137 +96 — 33.3% -1.01 2–5 (29%) 1–6 (14%) 90.2 -0.76 2017 1632 93.9 -2.78 -4.11 0.400 35.5% — — — — — — — — -0.07
32 2023 1599 111.2 +1.18 -0.42 1.044 50.4% — — — 50.0% +0.33 1–1 1–1 — -0.12 2018 1613 105.0 -4.25 -1.02 0.691 41.5% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1518 93.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1898 145.2 -0.88 +0.15 0.979 49.6% -142 +141 — 45.0% -0.25 51–62 (45%) 69–91 (43%) 92.9 -0.52 — 1810 134.9 -1.24 -1.13 0.905 48.1% -103 +98 -139 37.7% -0.77 35–51 (41%) 41–66 (38%) 95.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.