Federico Gaio
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 26, 2021 | H2H |
| Radu Albot | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Diego Schwartzman | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 22, 2021 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 21, 2021 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Federico Gaio vs Daniel Cox
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Federico Gaio vs Daniel Cox.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico Gaio | 2-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | Daniel Cox | Match data | Jul 3, 2023 | Q1 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federico Gaio | #1,461 | #124 | 548 | 1,568 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Daniel Cox | #1,462 | #206 | 240 | 1,517 | 0 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Federico Gaio | Daniel Cox | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #401 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #303 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #254 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Federico Gaio | Daniel Cox | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 20 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 2.3 | 5.0 | 59.3% | 60.3% | 50.9% | 58.9% | 0.0% | 56.5% | 24.1% |
| 23 | 2015 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 64.0% | 71.9% | 38.9% | 0.0% | 33.3% | 60.0% | 25.5% | 2014 | 2/2 | 8.0 | 4.5 | 63.5% | 61.5% | 45.7% | 48.2% | 50.0% | 55.9% | 30.9% |
| 24 | 2016 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 62.5% | 60.0% | 25.0% | 58.3% | 42.9% | 46.9% | 39.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 4/4 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 52.9% | 75.3% | 53.0% | 73.1% | 32.1% | 64.8% | 31.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 2/2 | 4.5 | 7.5 | 54.6% | 67.8% | 48.1% | 71.7% | 36.7% | 58.9% | 32.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 1/1 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 55.1% | 69.4% | 47.5% | 44.4% | 42.9% | 59.6% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 3/3 | 9.0 | 3.7 | 56.7% | 73.1% | 47.7% | 40.0% | 45.7% | 62.1% | 37.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 5/5 | 2.0 | 2.4 | 58.7% | 64.4% | 47.9% | 31.5% | 37.6% | 57.6% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 2.0 | 45.8% | 78.8% | 38.5% | 70.0% | 25.0% | 56.9% | 34.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 18/18 | 5.0 | 4.6 | 56.2% | 69.9% | 46.7% | 49.2% | 37.3% | 59.7% | 33.9% | — | 5/5 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 61.0% | 60.7% | 48.8% | 54.6% | 20.0% | 56.3% | 26.8% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Federico Gaio | Daniel Cox | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1482 | 90.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1496 | 99.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 1495 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1480 | 98.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1495 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2012 | 1482 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1464 | 93.1 | -1.71 | -2.88 | 0.553 | 41.5% | — | — | +27 | 0.0% | -3.29 | — | — | — | +0.31 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1465 | 100.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1499 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 1505 | 112.7 | -0.95 | +1.71 | 0.637 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 | 2014 | 1490 | 102.8 | -1.06 | -0.72 | 0.701 | 44.0% | — | — | — | 16.7% | -2.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.03 |
| 24 | 2016 | 1472 | 100.3 | -0.98 | -2.76 | 0.735 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 | 2015 | 1473 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 1478 | 103.6 | -1.30 | -0.39 | 0.899 | 48.1% | — | +54 | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.37 | 2016 | 1492 | 107.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 1550 | 114.7 | +0.83 | -1.03 | 0.792 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.20 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.01 | 2017 | 1475 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 1488 | 103.6 | -1.90 | -4.23 | 0.859 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 1429 | 102.4 | +0.59 | -1.53 | 0.979 | 49.5% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 1515 | 114.2 | -0.31 | -1.59 | 0.819 | 46.7% | — | -47 | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 1478 | 99.3 | -0.15 | -1.03 | 0.806 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 1475 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1467 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 1466 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1452 | 99.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1569 | 109.1 | -0.41 | -1.25 | 0.842 | 47.0% | — | +4 | — | 20.9% | -1.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–7 (13%) | 95.6 | +1.94 | — | 1518 | 97.7 | -1.45 | -2.02 | 0.613 | 42.5% | — | — | +27 | 7.7% | -2.77 | — | 1–1 | — | +5.60 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Daniel Cox
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeremy Chardy | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 25, 2014 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 11, 2014 | H2H |
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 22, 2011 | H2H |
| Donald Young | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 15, 2011 | H2H |
| James Ward | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 8, 2011 | H2H |