H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Federico Gaio vs Luca Vanni

Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Federico Gaio vs Luca Vanni.

ITA Age 34 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 0
0 main draw meetings
ITA Age 41 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Luca Vanni #157 5-7 6-2 6-3 Federico Gaio #174 Match data Jan 16, 2017 Q1 Q Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Federico Gaio #1,461 #124 548 1,568 3 15 16.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Luca Vanni #1,468 #100 560 1,672 5 18 21.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Federico Gaio Luca Vanni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 2015 0–1 0.0% #245 1,505 0 0
24 2016 0–1 0.0% #175 1,471 0 0
25 2017 2–2 50.0% #254 1,478 0 0
26 2018 0–2 0.0% #210 1,549 0 0
27 2019 0–1 0.0% #152 1,487 0 0
28 2020 0–3 0.0% #137 1,428 0 0
29 2021 1–4 20.0% #153 1,515 0 0
30 2022 0–1 0.0% #425 1,478 0 0 2015 4–9 30.8% #106 1,593 0 0
31 2016 1–5 16.7% #157 1,502 0 0
32 2017 0–2 0.0% #236 1,505 0 0
33 2018 0–1 0.0% #168 1,521 0 0
34 2019 0–1 0.0% #306 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Federico Gaio Luca Vanni
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
23 2015 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2016 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2019 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2020 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2021 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 2022 0 1 1 0.0% 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2016 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
32 2017 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2018 0 1 1 0.0%
34 2019 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 0 8 8 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 9 10 10.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Federico Gaio Luca Vanni
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
23 2015 1/1 2.0 4.0 64.0% 71.9% 38.9% 0.0% 33.3% 60.0% 25.5% —/—
24 2016 1/1 0.0 3.0 62.5% 60.0% 25.0% 58.3% 42.9% 46.9% 39.1% —/—
25 2017 4/4 7.0 7.5 52.9% 75.3% 53.0% 73.1% 32.1% 64.8% 31.7% —/—
26 2018 2/2 4.5 7.5 54.6% 67.8% 48.1% 71.7% 36.7% 58.9% 32.6% —/—
27 2019 1/1 10.0 5.0 55.1% 69.4% 47.5% 44.4% 42.9% 59.6% 34.7% —/—
28 2020 3/3 9.0 3.7 56.7% 73.1% 47.7% 40.0% 45.7% 62.1% 37.2% —/—
29 2021 5/5 2.0 2.4 58.7% 64.4% 47.9% 31.5% 37.6% 57.6% 34.7% —/—
30 2022 1/1 4.0 2.0 45.8% 78.8% 38.5% 70.0% 25.0% 56.9% 34.7% 2015 13/13 10.7 3.2 58.0% 73.4% 52.8% 58.6% 34.6% 64.4% 29.0%
31 —/— 2016 6/6 9.3 2.2 54.4% 78.1% 46.7% 39.2% 32.8% 63.6% 31.8%
32 —/— 2017 2/2 1.5 3.0 55.3% 51.9% 38.5% 38.9% 33.3% 45.7% 28.7%
33 —/— 2018 1/1 7.0 1.0 57.6% 71.1% 46.4% 62.5% 0.0% 60.6% 21.2%
34 —/— 2019 1/1 25.0 7.0 58.3% 77.5% 46.6% 76.9% 50.0% 64.6% 30.8%
Career 18/18 5.0 4.6 56.2% 69.9% 46.7% 49.2% 37.3% 59.7% 33.9% 23/23 10.0 3.0 56.8% 72.9% 49.4% 52.8% 33.2% 62.4% 29.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Federico Gaio Luca Vanni
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2010 1495 102.2
20 2012 1482 99.7
23 2015 1505 112.7 -0.95 +1.71 0.637 42.6% 0.0% -2.50 +0.01 2008 1500 101.2
24 2016 1472 100.3 -0.98 -2.76 0.735 43.0% 0.0% -2.00 -0.04 2009 1488 90.8
25 2017 1478 103.6 -1.30 -0.39 0.899 48.1% +54 40.0% -0.60 2–0 1–1 +0.37
26 2018 1550 114.7 +0.83 -1.03 0.792 47.1% 0.0% -2.20 0–2 -0.01
27 2019 1488 103.6 -1.90 -4.23 0.859 46.7% 33.3% -1.33 0–1 +0.04
28 2020 1429 102.4 +0.59 -1.53 0.979 49.5% 22.2% -1.00 0–1 0–2 +0.26
29 2021 1515 114.2 -0.31 -1.59 0.819 46.7% -47 20.0% -1.80 0–1 -0.31 2014 1472 97.0
30 2022 1478 99.3 -0.15 -1.03 0.806 45.8% 0.0% -2.50 0–1 +0.03 2015 1594 120.1 -0.29 -3.76 0.815 47.3% +76 36.1% -0.83 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) +0.45
31 2023 1475 94.9 2016 1502 111.0 -0.34 -2.44 0.872 47.2% +2 33.3% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) +0.32
32 2024 1466 97.6 2017 1505 108.4 -3.58 +0.04 0.528 37.7% 0.0% -3.50 -0.28
33 2018 1522 109.8 +2.48 -0.12 0.537 43.2% 0.0% -3.00 -0.15
34 2019 1527 111.3 +0.95 +0.47 0.868 48.6% 40.0% -0.40 0–1 1–0 -0.07
Career 1569 109.1 -0.41 -1.25 0.842 47.0% +4 20.9% -1.44 2–2 (50%) 1–7 (13%) 95.6 +1.94 1673 115.7 -0.41 -2.74 0.783 46.4% +2 +76 33.3% -1.00 3–7 (30%) 8–6 (57%) 99.8 +1.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.