H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 1-2
Diego Schwartzman holds a 2–1 lead over Felix Auger-Aliassime in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Diego Schwartzman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Diego Schwartzman won the 2022 Barcelona quarterfinal 3-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 25
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Argentina
Age 33
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 23, 2022* | Barcelona | ATP 500 | QF | Clay | Diego Schwartzman | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data |
| May 12, 2021* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-1 6-3 | Diego Schwartzman | Match data |
| Oct 24, 2020* | Cologne 2 | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Diego Schwartzman | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,105 | 277 | 172 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Diego Schwartzman | #879 | #8 | 3,765 | 2,047 | 238 | 211 | 53.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Diego Schwartzman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #11 | 1,982 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #117 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,051 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #61 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2015 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #88 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #5 | 2,028 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 38–27 | 58.5% | #26 | 1,963 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2026 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #4 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 2018 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #17 | 1,874 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #14 | 1,953 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 24–13 | 64.9% | #9 | 2,001 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 34–19 | 64.2% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #370 | 1,625 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #884 | 1,632 | 0 | 4 |