H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 1-1
Felix Auger-Aliassime and Dominic Thiem are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Felix Auger-Aliassime won the 2024 Australian Open first round 6-3 7-5 6-7(5) 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 25
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 32
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-3 7-5 6-7(5) 5-7 6-3 | Dominic Thiem | Match data |
| Sep 8, 2020* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Dominic Thiem | 7-6(4) 6-1 6-1 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,105 | 277 | 172 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Dominic Thiem | #1,174 | #3 | 9,125 | 2,241 | 337 | 207 | 61.9% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 10 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Dominic Thiem | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #638 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #309 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #139 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #11 | 1,982 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #39 | 1,848 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,051 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,889 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2016 | 58–24 | 70.7% | #8 | 2,015 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #5 | 1,958 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #5 | 2,028 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 50–21 | 70.4% | #8 | 2,064 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2026 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #4 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 2019 | 48–17 | 73.8% | #4 | 2,145 | 0 | 16 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 24–7 | 77.4% | #3 | 2,200 | 1 | 17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #15 | 2,014 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,907 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #98 | 1,799 | 1 | 17 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #524 | 1,627 | 1 | 17 |