H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Milos Raonic H2H: 2-1
Felix Auger-Aliassime holds a 2–1 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Felix Auger-Aliassime leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Felix Auger-Aliassime won the 2019 Canada Masters third round 6-3 3-6 0-0 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 25
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 35
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2019* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Felix Auger-Aliassime | 6-3 3-6 0-0 (ret.) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2019* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Felix Auger-Aliassime | (w/o) | Milos Raonic | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2018* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Milos Raonic | 6-4 6-4 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,105 | 277 | 172 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Milos Raonic | #634 | #3 | 5,450 | 2,246 | 369 | 186 | 66.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Milos Raonic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #156 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #11 | 1,982 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 30–18 | 62.5% | #31 | 1,839 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,051 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,987 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2013 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #11 | 2,034 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 5 | 2014 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #8 | 2,087 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #5 | 2,028 | 0 | 8 | 2015 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,047 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2026 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #4 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 2016 | 52–19 | 73.2% | #3 | 2,143 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #24 | 2,053 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #18 | 1,952 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #31 | 1,919 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 23–10 | 69.7% | #14 | 1,996 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #70 | 1,964 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,909 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #238 | 1,903 | 0 | 8 |