H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Felix Auger-Aliassime vs Mischa Zverev H2H: 0-1
Mischa Zverev holds a 1–0 lead over Felix Auger-Aliassime in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mischa Zverev leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mischa Zverev won the 2018 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Canada
Age 25
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2018* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Mischa Zverev | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-1 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | #4 | #4 | 4,740 | 2,105 | 277 | 172 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
| Mischa Zverev | #1,373 | #25 | 1,664 | 2,007 | 134 | 199 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Felix Auger-Aliassime | Mischa Zverev | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2018 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #108 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2019 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #21 | 1,859 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #151 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2020 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #21 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2021 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #11 | 1,982 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #80 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 51–23 | 68.9% | #6 | 2,051 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #78 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #29 | 1,858 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #82 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 5 | 2011 | 2–18 | 10.0% | #211 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2025 | 50–24 | 67.6% | #5 | 2,028 | 0 | 8 | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2026 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #4 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 2013 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #176 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #171 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #51 | 1,917 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 30–31 | 49.2% | #33 | 1,850 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 19–29 | 39.6% | #69 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #281 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #264 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #346 | 1,521 | 0 | 1 |